The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Ostrom, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172133 · Cited by 8,656
Governing the commons — the evolution of institutions for collective action
Weede, E. (1992) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/0176-2680(92)90034-e · Cited by 3,919
A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas
Ostrom, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702288104 · Cited by 2,728 · cited 1×
“The implication for trade-off research is that when they aim to support spatial planning, it is recommended to embrace the full complexity, rather than dissecting simple sub-systems of the trade-off at hand (Ostrom 2007).”
BackgroundWho's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001 · Cited by 2,659
The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods
Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174312 · Cited by 2,637
Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D., & Gordon, L. J. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x · Cited by 2,481
Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K. M., Daily, G. C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., et al. (2009) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/080023 · Cited by 2,389 · cited 2×
“…equitable and fair outcomes by taking into account distributive impacts of ES trade-offs (derived from: Rodríguez et al. 2006, Bennett et al. 2009, Nelson et al. 2009, Hirsch et al. 2010, RaudseppHearne et al. 2010, Elmqvist et al. 2011, McShane et al. 2011, Phelps et al. 2012, Hicks et al. 2013).”
BackgroundEcosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107 · Cited by 2,016
Cited by
Guidance for successful tree planting initiatives
Brancalion, P. H. S., & Holl, K. D. (2020) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13725 · Cited by 346
Ershad Sarabi, S., Han, Q., L. Romme, A. G., de Vries, B., & Wendling, L. (2019) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources8030121 · Cited by 319
Assessing ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: The need for a more mechanistic approach
Dade, M. C., Mitchell, M. G. E., McAlpine, C. A., & Rhodes, J. R. (2019) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-018-1127-7 · Cited by 298
Shen, J., Li, S., Liu, L., Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, H., & Wu, S. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125193 · Cited by 268
Working on the boundaries—How do science use and interpret the nature-based solution concept?
Hanson, H. I., Wickenberg, B., & Alkan Olsson, J. (2020) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104302 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Turkelboom, F., Leone, M., Jacobs, S., Kelemen, E., García-Llorente, M., Baró, F., Termansen, M., Barton, D. N., Berry, P., Stange, E., Thoonen, M., Kalóczkai, Á., Vadineanu, A., Castro, A. J., Czúcz, B., Röckmann, C., Wurbs, D., Odee, D., Preda, E., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Rusch, G. M., Pastur, G. M., Palomo, I., Dick, J., Casaer, J., van Dijk, J., Priess, J. A., Langemeyer, J., Mustajoki, J., Kopperoinen, L., Baptist, M. J., Peri, P. L., Mukhopadhyay, R., Aszalós, R., Roy, S. B., Luque, S., & Rusch, V.
- Venue
- Ecosystem Services
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 29
- Pages
- 566-578
- ISSN
- 2212-0416 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2770987362
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 20.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.011
- The paper
- Turkelboom, F., Leone, M., Jacobs, S., Kelemen, E., García-Llorente, M., Baró, F., Termansen, M., Barton, D. N., Berry, P., Stange, E., Thoonen, M., Kalóczkai, Á., Vadineanu, A., Castro, A. J., Czúcz, B., Röckmann, C., Wurbs, D., Odee, D., Preda, E., . . . Rusch, V. (2018). When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning. Ecosystem Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
