Speech monitoring and repairs in preschool children’s social and private speech.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In children's private speech, self-repairs are present at the conceptualization level.
“In children’s private speech, which, as mentioned above, has been argued to be a precursor to inner speech, self-repairs are also present at the conceptualization level, as shown by occurrences of re-wording or amending of utterances (e.g., Manfra et al., 2016).”
From The ConDialInt Model: Condensation, Dialogality, and Intentionality Dimensions of Inner Speech Within a Hierarchical Predictive Control Framework (2019) · cites this paper as Manfra et al., 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Manfra, L., Tyler, S. L., & Winsler, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Manfra, Louis
- Venue
- Early Childhood Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 37
- Pages
- 94-105
- ISSN
- 0885-2006 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2497824015
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Early Childhood Research Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- speech monitoring, self-healing, private speech, social speech, preschool children, speech errors, selective attention, language development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review