The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: A review
Abstract
Abstract We provide a brief synopsis of the unique physical and ecological attributes of sandy beach ecosystems and review the main anthropogenic pressures acting on the world's single largest type of open shoreline. Threats to beaches arise from a range of stressors which span a spectrum of impact scales from localised effects (e.g. trampling) to a truly global reach (e.g. sea-level rise). These pressures act at multiple temporal and spatial scales, translating into ecological impacts that are manifested across several dimensions in time and space so that today almost every beach on every coastline is threatened by human activities. Press disturbances (whatever the impact source involved) are becoming increasingly common, operating on time scales of years to decades. However, long-term data sets that describe either the natural dynamics of beach systems or the human impacts on beaches are scarce and fragmentary. A top priority is to implement long-term field experiments and monitoring programmes that quantify the dynamics of key ecological attributes on sandy beaches. Because of the inertia associated with global climate change and human population growth, no realistic management scenario will alleviate these threats in the short term. The immediate priority is to avoid further development of coastal areas likely to be directly impacted by retreating shorelines. There is also scope for improvement in experimental design to better distinguish natural variability from anthropogenic impacts. Sea-level rise and other effects of global warming are expected to intensify other anthropogenic pressures, and could cause unprecedented ecological impacts. The definition of the relevant scales of analysis, which will vary according to the magnitude of the impact and the organisational level under analysis, and the recognition of a physical–biological coupling at different scales, should be included in approaches to quantify impacts. Zoning strategies and marine reserves, which have not been widely implemented in sandy beaches, could be a key tool for biodiversity conservation and should also facilitate spillover effects into adjacent beach habitats. Setback and zoning strategies need to be enforced through legislation, and all relevant stakeholders should be included in the design, implementation and institutionalisation of these initiatives. New perspectives for rational management of sandy beaches require paradigm shifts, by including not only basic ecosystem principles, but also incentives for effective governance and sharing of management roles between government and local stakeholders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Volcanic carbon dioxide vents show ecosystem effects of ocean acidification
Hall-Spencer, J. M., Rodolfo-Metalpa, R., Martin, S., Ransome, E., Fine, M., Turner, S. M., Rowley, S. J., Tedesco, D., & Buia, M.-C. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07051 · Cited by 1,359 · cited 2×
“…unit less than pre-industrial levels and predicted to decline by a further 0.3–0.4 units by the end of the century) will reduce calcification rates and calcium metabolism in marine organisms (Feely et al., 2004), including several sandy beach molluscs and crustaceans (Hall-Spencer et al., 2008).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Bioremediation potential of hydrocarbon-utilizing fungi from select marine niches of India
Barnes, N. M., Khodse, V. B., Lotlikar, N. P., Meena, R. M., & Damare, S. R. (2018) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-017-1043-8 · Cited by 92
Thomsen, M., Wernberg, T., Olden, J., Byers, J. E., Bruno, J., Silliman, B., & Schiel, D. (2014) · NeoBiota · doi:10.3897/neobiota.22.6224 · Cited by 51
Implications of tides for life on exoplanets
Lingam, M., & Loeb, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.04594 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Defeo, O., McLachlan, A., Schoeman, D. S., Schlacher, T. A., Dugan, J., Jones, A., Lastra, M., & Scapini, F.
- Venue
- Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0272-7714 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970351497
- Cited by
- 1,234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.