The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,269
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Introduction to research in education
Ary, D. (1972) · Cited by 7,699
Perspectives on Activity Theory
(1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812774 · Cited by 3,234
Activity theory and individual and social transformation
Engeström, Y. (1999) · Perspectives on Activity Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812774.003 · Cited by 3,142
Cited by
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008 · Cited by 1,574
Self-citationMobile collaborative language learning: State of the art
Kukulska‐Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12580 · Cited by 382
A scoping review of research on digital game-based language learning
Hung, H.-T., Yang, J. C., Hwang, G.-J., Chu, H.-C., & Wang, C.-C. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.001 · Cited by 319
Self-citationMobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lin, J.-J., & Lin, H. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359 · Cited by 262
Zheng, L., Niu, J., Zhong, L., & Gyasi, J. F. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.2015693 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Yang, J.-M.
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 16
- Pages
- 68-84
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1833950937
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.09.001
- The paper
- Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Yang, J.-M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.09.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
