Cited by 39CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

Carbonation of Activated Serpentine for Direct Flue Gas Mineralization

Open access
Werner, Mischa, Hariharan, Subrahmaniam B., Bortolan, Andressa V., Zingaretti, Daniela, Baciocchi, Renato, Mazzotti, Marco·2013·Energy Procedia

Abstract

Research in mineral carbonation has moved towards process concepts that combine the capture of CO 2 from flue gas with its conversion into stable carbonates. This requires highly reactive source materials that dissolve under lean CO 2 pressures and temperatures. Activated serpentine has been used in this study, and its carbonation potential under flue gas conditions has been investigated. Single-step carbonation experiments were performed in stirred reactors with gas-dip tubes, at partial pressures of CO 2 up to 1 bar, temperatures between 30 °C and 90 °C, with and without concurrent grinding using a ball mill. The pH and solids were monitored in-situ, and the degree of carbonation of the products was quantified using thermogravimetric analysis. Given the low CO 2 pressure, carbonation was successful, as confirmed by the formation of the two magnesium carbonates nesquehonite and hydromagnesite. However, under all conditions investigated, including grinding, the extent of carbonation did not exceed 20%. It was concluded that after the onset of precipitation, the reactor solution in single-step carbonation experiments reaches equilibrium conditions with respect to both serpentine dissolution and carbonate precipitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.519

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ammonia gas and sulfate ions in solution can be used to regenerate the ammonium sulfate reactant.

    “Additionally, the ammonia gas and the sulfate ions in the solution can be used to regenerate the ammonium sulfate reactant.50”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Werner, M., Hariharan, S. B., Bortolan, A. V., Zingaretti, D., Baciocchi, R., & Mazzotti, M.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Corresponding author
Mazzotti, Marco
Venue
Energy Procedia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013
Volume
37
Pages
5929-5937
ISSN
1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089538831
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
8.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Procedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
CO2 mineralization, flue gas CO2 capture, nesquehonite, hydromagnesite, magnesium carbonate precipitation, ball milling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review