Carbonation of Activated Serpentine for Direct Flue Gas Mineralization
Open accessAbstract
Research in mineral carbonation has moved towards process concepts that combine the capture of CO 2 from flue gas with its conversion into stable carbonates. This requires highly reactive source materials that dissolve under lean CO 2 pressures and temperatures. Activated serpentine has been used in this study, and its carbonation potential under flue gas conditions has been investigated. Single-step carbonation experiments were performed in stirred reactors with gas-dip tubes, at partial pressures of CO 2 up to 1 bar, temperatures between 30 °C and 90 °C, with and without concurrent grinding using a ball mill. The pH and solids were monitored in-situ, and the degree of carbonation of the products was quantified using thermogravimetric analysis. Given the low CO 2 pressure, carbonation was successful, as confirmed by the formation of the two magnesium carbonates nesquehonite and hydromagnesite. However, under all conditions investigated, including grinding, the extent of carbonation did not exceed 20%. It was concluded that after the onset of precipitation, the reactor solution in single-step carbonation experiments reaches equilibrium conditions with respect to both serpentine dissolution and carbonate precipitation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ammonia gas and sulfate ions in solution can be used to regenerate the ammonium sulfate reactant.
“Additionally, the ammonia gas and the sulfate ions in the solution can be used to regenerate the ammonium sulfate reactant.50”
From Utilization of mineral carbonation products: current state and potential (2019) · cites this paper as [50]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations
Kelemen, P., Benson, S. M., Pilorgé, H., Psarras, P., & Wilcox, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2019.00009 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
“However, the most favored technique for CO2 plume monitoring is seismic imaging (Hovorka et al., 2006; Pevzner et al., 2011; Ivanova et al., 2012; Ajo-Franklin et al., 2013; White, 2013; Jenkins et al., 2015).”
MethodUtilization of mineral carbonation products: current state and potential
Woodall, C. M., McQueen, N., Pilorgé, H., & Wilcox, J. (2019) · Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/ghg.1940 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
- Authors
- Werner, M., Hariharan, S. B., Bortolan, A. V., Zingaretti, D., Baciocchi, R., & Mazzotti, M.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Mazzotti, Marco
- Venue
- Energy Procedia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 37
- Pages
- 5929-5937
- ISSN
- 1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089538831
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Energy Procedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
- Keywords
- CO2 mineralization, flue gas CO2 capture, nesquehonite, hydromagnesite, magnesium carbonate precipitation, ball milling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review