Comparative Analysis of Various Compensating Devices in Energy Trading Radial Distribution System for Voltage Regulation and Loss Mitigation Using Blockchain Technology and Bat Algorithm
Open accessAbstract
The electric power distribution plays a crucial part in the power systems to maintain the power quality and stability of the system for loss mitigation and voltage regulation. The reactive power compensators like a capacitor, DG, and DSTATCOM play a vital role in power quality and stability improvement by providing proper reactive power in the distribution system. This article provides a critical review and comparative analysis of various compensating devices allocation to achieve power loss mitigation and voltage regulation in the radial distribution system (RDS). The Bat Algorithm (BA) and Voltage Stability Index (VSI) are utilized for determining the optimal size and site of the compensating devices in the RDS. Further, the application of Blockchain technology is utilized for voltage regulation of energy trading RDS. To show the effectiveness of the present study, an IEEE 33 test system is considered. All three compensators are implemented in IEEE 33 test system and compared with existing approaches. The present study is very much helpful to the Distribution Network Operators for selecting the suitable compensator in real-time applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The basic active and reactive power of the loads is reported in the literature.
“The basic active and reactive power of the loads is reported in the literature (Yuvaraj et al., 2021).”
From Over-Voltage Regulation of Distribution Networks by Coordinated Operation of PV Inverters and Demand Side Management Program (2022) · cites this paper as Yuvaraj et al., 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Heidari Yazdi, S. S., Rahimi, T., Khadem Haghighian, S., Gharehpetian, G. B., & Bagheri, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2022.920654 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yuvaraj, T., Devabalaji, K. R., Srinivasan, S., Prabaharan, N., Hariharan, R., Haes Alhelou, H., & Ashokkumar, B.
- Affiliations
- Saveetha University (IN)
- Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science (IN)
- SASTRA University (IN)
- Thiagarajar College of Engineering (IN)
- Venue
- Energy Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 8312-8321
- ISSN
- 2352-4847 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3199560538
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Energy Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University College Dublin
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Quality and Harmonics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
- Keywords
- reactive power compensation, voltage regulation, power loss reduction, radial distribution systems, energy trade, blockchain, bat algorithm, voltage stability index, capacitor placement, distributed generation, DSTATCOM, IEEE 33-bus system
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review