Cited by 192Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Impact of diabetes mellitus on long-term survival in patients with congestive heart failure

de Groote, P·2004·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: To test the hypothesis that diabetic status may be used as a prognostic indicator in heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 1246 consecutive patients with left ventricular dysfunction. All patients had a cardiopulmonary exercise test and an echocardiogram. Cardiac catheterisation was systematically performed to define HF aetiology. Twenty-two percent of the patients were diabetic (hypoglycaemic drugs or fasting blood glucose >126 mg/dL); in diabetic patients, HF aetiology was ischaemic in 58% vs. 40% in non-diabetic patients ( p < 0.0001). Clinical follow-up (median 1200 days) was obtained for 1241 patients. There was a statistically significant effect of diabetes mellitus on cardiac survival that differed according to HF aetiology (interaction p > 0.01). Diabetes mellitus was an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in ischaemic patients (HR=1.54 [1.13; 2.09]; P = 0.006) but not in non-ischaemic patients (HR=0.65 [0.39; 1.07];p = 0.09). When diabetic patients were defined as patients receiving hypoglycaemic drugs at baseline, diabetes mellitus remained an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in ischaemic patients (HR=1.43 [1.03; 1.98]; p = 0.03) while diabetes mellitus was associated with a statistically significant decrease in cardiovascular mortality in non-ischaemic patients (HR=0.46 [0.23; 0.88]; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus in HF patients is markedly influenced by the underlying aetiology and is particularly deleterious in those with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.01.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 192

Authors
de Groote, P.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2004-04
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
656-662
ISSN
0195-668X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142039951
Cited by
192
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, long-term survival, cardiovascular mortality, prognostic factors, heart failure etiology, ischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular dysfunction, hypoglycaemic drugs, non-ischemic heart failure
MeSH terms
Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Myocardial Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review