Cited by 157Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Suppression of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias—results of the SOPAT trial

PATTEN, M, MAAS, R, BAUER, P, LUDERITZ, B, SONNTAG, F, DLUZNIEWSKI, M, HATALA, R, OPOLSKI, G +2 more·2004·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIM: The indication to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is controversial. The Suppression of Paroxysmal Atrial Tachyarrhythmias (SOPAT) trial was designed to answer the following questions: (1) What is the average rate of spontaneous events of symptomatic PAF with and without anti-arrhythmic medication? (2) what is the prevalence of severe side-effects? and (3) is the fixed combination of Quinidine + Verapamil inferior to the efficacy of sotalol or not? METHODS AND RESULTS: Within 60 months 172 centres in Germany, Poland, and The Slovak Republic prospectively enrolled 1033 patients (mean age 60 years, 62% male) with documented frequent episodes of symptomatic PAF. Patients were randomised to either Quinidine + Verapamil 480/240 mg/d (high dose; 263 patients), Quinidine + Verapamil 320/160 mg/d (low dose; 255 patients), Sotalol 320 mg/d (264 patients) or placebo (251 patients), of which 1012 patients entered the intention-to-treat analysis. The primary endpoint was the time to first recurrence of symptomatic PAF or premature discontinuation. Secondary outcome parameters were the total number of symptomatic episodes and tolerability of the tested drugs. Patients were followed for a period of up to 12 months by daily and symptom-triggered trans-telephonic ECG-monitoring (Tele-ECG). The mean time under treatment was 233 +/- 152 days. Regarding the primary endpoint, all active treatments were superior to placebo and not different from each other. A total of 756 patients reached the primary endpoint within 105.7 +/- 8.7 d (mean +/- SEM) in the placebo group, vs. Quinidine + Verapamil (high dose) (150.4 +/- 10 d, p = 0.0061), vs. Quinidine + Verapamil (low dose) (148.9 +/- 10.6 d, p = 0.0006), vs. Sotalol (145.6 +/- 93 d, p = 0.0007). All three treatments were also effective in the reduction of AF burden (days with symptomatic AF [%] mean +/- SD, p vs. placebo): Quinidine + Verapamil (high dose) (3.4 +/- 12, p = 0.0001), Quinidine + Verapamil (low dose) (4.5 +/- 12.3, p = 0.008) and Sotalol (2.9 +/- 6.5, p = 0.026) compared to placebo (6.1 +/- 13.5). A total of four deaths, 13 syncopes, and one ventricular tachycardia (VT) occurred during the active study period, of which one death and one VT were related to Quinidine/Verapamil. CONCLUSION: Taken together, anti-arrhythmic therapy with the fixed combination of Quinidine + Verapamil is as effective as Sotalol in the reduction of the recurrence rate of symptomatic PAF with a low but definite risk of severe side-effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 157

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Heilmann E, Bender F, Bachour G et al. Combined treatment auricular fibrillation and other tachycardic arrhythmias using quini- dine and verapamil. Med Welt 1972;23:1792-4.
  2. Patten M, Koch H-P, Sonntag F et al. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the prophylaxis of symptomatic atrial fibrillation/flutter - Rationale and design of the SOPAT trial. Z Kardiol 1999;88: 185-94.

Authors
PATTEN, M., MAAS, R., BAUER, P., LUDERITZ, B., SONNTAG, F., DLUZNIEWSKI, M., HATALA, R., OPOLSKI, G., MULLER, H., & MEINERTZ, T.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University Hospital Bonn (DE)
  • Central Clinical Hospital (PL)
  • Abbott (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
PATTEN, M
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2004-08
Volume
25
Issue
16
Pages
1395-1404
ISSN
0195-668X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110571743
Cited by
157
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universität Hamburg
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, antiarrhythmic therapy, quinidine, verapamil, sotalol, fixed-dose combination, atrial fibrillation recurrence, drug tolerability, adverse drug reactions, treatment discontinuation, dose comparison, anticoagulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Drug Therapy, Combination, Electrocardiography, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quinidine, Sotalol, Tachycardia, Verapamil, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review