Environmental assessment in slum improvement programs: Some evidence from a study on infrastructure projects in two Dhaka slums
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chowdhury 2006 was excluded because it had no relevant outcome (only measures physical changes to the environment, no health or socio-economic outcomes).
“Chowdhury 2006 No relevant outcome ‐ only measures physical changes to the environment no health or socio‐economic outcomes.”
From Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes (2013) · cites this paper as Chowdhury 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Turley, R., Saith, R., Bhan, N., Rehfuess, E., & Carter, B. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010067.pub2 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chowdhury, F. J., & Amin, A. T. M. N.
- Affiliations
- Asian Institute of Technology (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Chowdhury, Farhat Jahan
- Venue
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 530-552
- ISSN
- 0195-9255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050708054
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Asian Institute of Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Keywords
- environmental assessment, slum upgrading, urban infrastructure projects, informal settlements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
