CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assessing changes in eco-productivity of wastewater treatment plants: The role of costs, pollutant removal efficiency, and greenhouse gas emissions

Gémar, Germán, Gómez, Trinidad, Molinos-Senante, María, Caballero, Rafael, Sala-Garrido, Ramón·2018·Environmental Impact Assessment Review
DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Al-Refaie, 2016, DEA window analysis and Malmquist index to assess energy efficiency and productivity in Jordanian industrial sector, Energy Efficiency, 9, 1299, 10.1007/s12053-016-9424-0 · DOI
  2. Barros, 2012, The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output, Omega, 40, 1, 10.1016/j.omega.2011.02.005 · DOI
  3. Beltrán-Esteve, 2017, Assessing eco-efficiency: a metafrontier directional distance function approach using life cycle analysis, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 63, 116, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.01.001 · DOI
  4. Bidstrup, 2015, Life cycle thinking in impact assessment-current practice and LCA gains, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 54, 72, 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.05.003 · DOI
  5. Boussemart, 2003, Luenberger and Malmquist productivity indices: theoretical comparisons and empirical illustration, Bull. Econ. Res., 55, 391, 10.1111/1467-8586.00183 · DOI
  6. Castellet, 2016, Efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants: a data envelopment analysis approach integrating technical, economic, and environmental issues, J. Environ. Manag., 167, 160, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.037 · DOI
  7. Chen, 2017, Eco-efficiency assessment for global warming potential of ethylene production processes: a case study of China, J. Clean. Prod., 142, 3109, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.156 · DOI
  8. Dong, 2017, Measuring and explaining eco-efficiencies of wastewater treatment plants in China: an uncertainty analysis perspective, Water Res., 112, 195, 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.026 · DOI
  9. Fujii, 2014, Indian bank efficiency and productivity changes with undesirable outputs: a disaggregated approach, J. Bank. Finance, 38, 41, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.09.022 · DOI
  10. Fujii, 2015, Decomposition of productivity considering multi-environmental pollutants in Chinese industrial sector, Rev. Dev. Econ., 19, 75, 10.1111/rode.12123 · DOI
  11. Fujii, 2017, Bank efficiency, productivity, and convergence in EU countries: a weighted Russell directional distance model, Eur. J. Finance
  12. Gu, 2016, The feasibility and challenges of energy self-sufficient wastewater treatment plants, Appl. Energy, 204, 1463, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.069 · DOI
  13. Guerrini, 2015, Measuring the efficiency of wastewater services through data envelopment analysis, Water Sci. Technol., 71, 1845, 10.2166/wst.2015.169 · DOI
  14. Guerrini, 2017, Cost savings in wastewater treatment processes: the role of environmental and operational drivers, Water Resour. Manag., 31, 2465, 10.1007/s11269-017-1586-9 · DOI
  15. Hernández-Sancho, 2011, Techno-economical efficiency and productivity change of wastewater treatment plants: the role of internal and external factors, J. Environ. Monit., 13, 3448, 10.1039/c1em10388a · DOI
  16. IPCC, 2006, Vol. 5
  17. Ji, 2013, Evaluation on China's regional eco-efficiency —based on ecological footprint methodology, Contemp. Econ. Manag., 35, 57
  18. Laitinen, 2017, Resource efficient wastewater treatment in a developing area—climate change impacts and economic feasibility, Ecol. Eng., 103, 217, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.017 · DOI
  19. Larrey-Lassalle, 2017, An innovative implementation of LCA within the EIA procedure: lessons learned from two wastewater treatment plant case studies, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 63, 95, 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.12.004 · DOI
  20. Liu, 2017, DEA cross-efficiency evaluation considering undesirable output and ranking priority: a case study of eco-efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants, J. Clean. Prod., 142, 877, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.069 · DOI
  21. Lorenzo-Toja, 2017, Dynamic environmental efficiency assessment for wastewater treatment plants, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
  22. Luptacik, M. (2000). Optimization, dynamics and economic analysis. Data Envelopment Analysis as a Tool for Measurement of Eco-efficiency, pp. 36-48. E.J. Dockner et al. (eds.) Physica-Verlag Heidelberg. · DOI
  23. Mahlberg, 2011, Examining the drivers of total factor productivity change with an illustrative example of 14 EU countries, Ecol. Econ., 72, 60, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.001 · DOI
  24. Meneses, 2015, Life cycle assessment as an environmental evaluation tool for control strategies in wastewater treatment plants, J. Clean. Prod., 107, 653, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.057 · DOI
  25. Molinos-Senante, 2015, The impact of privatization approaches on the productivity growth of the water industry: a case study of Chile, Environ Sci Policy, 50, 166, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.015 · DOI
  26. Molinos-Senante, 2010, Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: a cost-benefit analysis, Sci. Total Environ., 408, 4396, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.014 · DOI
  27. Molinos-Senante, 2016, Eco-efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants using a weighted Russell directional distance model, J. Clean. Prod., 137, 1066, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.057 · DOI
  28. Molinos-Senante, 2016, Estimating the environmental and resource costs of leakage in water distribution systems: a shadow price approach, Sci. Total Environ., 568, 180, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.020 · DOI
  29. Oggioni, 2017, Eco-efficiency of the world cement industry: a data envelopment analysis, Energy Policy, 39, 2842, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.057 · DOI
  30. Pan, 2013, Agricultural eco-efficiency evaluation in China based on SBM model, Acta Ecol. Sin., 33, 3837, 10.5846/stxb201207080953 · DOI
  31. Peng, 2017, Eco-efficiency and its determinants at a tourism destination: a case study of Huangshan National Park, China, Tour. Manag., 60, 201, 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.12.005 · DOI
  32. Pérez, 2017, Energy and GHG emission efficiency in the Chilean manufacturing industry: sectoral and regional analysis by DEA and Malmquist indexes, Energy Econ., 66, 290, 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.022 · DOI
  33. Ren, 2017, Multi-criteria group decision-making based sustainability measurement of wastewater treatment processes, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 65, 91, 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.04.008 · DOI
  34. Roefs, 2017, Centralised, decentralised or hybrid sanitation systems? Economic evaluation under urban development uncertainty and phased expansion, Water Res., 109, 274, 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.051 · DOI
  35. Sala-Garrido, 2012, Assessing the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants in an uncertain context: a DEA with tolerances approach, Environ Sci Policy, 18, 34, 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.12.012 · DOI
  36. Simoes, 2012, Influence of regulation on the productivity of waste utilities. What can we learn with the Portuguese experience?, Waste Manag., 32, 1266, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.02.004 · DOI
  37. Tomei, 2016, Techno-economic and environmental assessment of upgrading alternatives for sludge stabilization in municipal wastewater treatment plants, J. Clean. Prod., 112, 3106, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.017 · DOI
  38. Wang, 2010, Carbon emission reduction in the municipal wastewater treatment field, Water Supply Sewerage, 6, 1
  39. Wei, 2013, An empirical analysis of the CO2 shadow price in Chinese thermal power enterprises, Energy Econ., 40, 22, 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.018 · DOI
  40. Yang, 2016, Assessing regional eco-efficiency from the perspective of resource, environmental and economic performance in China: a bootstrapping approach in global data envelopment analysis, J. Clean. Prod.
  41. Yin, 2014, Using eco-efficiency as an indicator for sustainable urban development: a case study of Chinese provincial capital cities, Ecol. Indic., 36, 665, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.003 · DOI
  42. Zelenyuk, 2014, Directional vs. Shephard's distance functions, Optim. Lett., 8, 2185, 10.1007/s11590-014-0726-x · DOI
  43. Zhou, 2014, On estimating shadow prices of undesirable outputs with efficiency models: a literature review, Appl. Energy, 130, 799, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.049 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 64

Metadata

Authors
Gémar, G., Gómez, T., Molinos-Senante, M., Caballero, R., & Sala-Garrido, R.
Venue
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
69
Pages
24-31
ISSN
0195-9255
DOI
10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.007
Cited by
64
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (ECO2016-76567-C4-4-R)
  • Junta de Andalucía (SEJ417)
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
  • Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (11160031)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review