Cited by 33

Environmental life cycle assessment of underground metro rail: A case study in Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India

Shinde, Amar Mohan, Dikshit, Anil Kumar, Soni, Arti·2024·Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Abstract

The metro rail systems have been vigorously promoted to reduce the emissions from the urban transport sector in India. However, their construction and operation are associated with high energy consumption and corresponding emissions. This study evaluated the life cycle environmental impact of the first underground metro rail transit in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India. The system boundary comprises the construction and maintenance of the tunnel, underground stations, slab track, power supply system, and trains. The operation phase accounts for the traction power demand for running trains and auxiliary power demand for operating the station services. GaBi 6.5 has been used to normalize the results per track-km (TKM) of the metro line and per passenger-km travelled (PKT). It has been found that the construction of underground stations is the major contributor (70% of 17300 t CO2-eq/TKM, 52 t SO2-eq/TKM) to the life cycle impact of the infrastructure, whereas the auxiliary power demand dominates the life cycle impact (63% of 25 g CO2-eq/PKT) of the metro rail. Further results show that the door-to-door trip with a local bus service will have a 58% lower impact than a competing sedan trip. On the basis of these results, possible recommendations were proposed, such as deploying the energy-efficient trains and metro stations, utilizing electricity that has met renewable goals, and endorsing high ridership. This study provides a background data to quantify the environmental imp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107501

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shinde, A. M., Dikshit, A. K., & Soni, A.
Venue
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
106
Pages
107501
ISSN
0195-9255
Cited by
33
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review