The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage
Porter, P. K., Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2003) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/30040740 · Cited by 7,510
(1985) · American Economic Review · Cited by 6,056
Technical Change and Economic Theory.
Swann, P., & Dosi, G. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234048 · Cited by 4,041
Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 · Cited by 3,763
Self-citationTheories of the Policy Process
Sabatier, P. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780367274689 · Cited by 3,490
The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms
Geels, F. W. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 · Cited by 3,092
Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002 · Cited by 2,741
Self-citationAnalyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 · Cited by 2,269
Self-citationOn the nature, function and composition of technological systems
Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/bf01224915 · Cited by 2,028
What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability
Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 · Cited by 1,712
Cited by
An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800
Self-citationThe life cycle of technological innovation systems
Markard, J. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.045 · Cited by 308
Self-citationGong, H., & Hansen, T. (2023) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.100689 · Cited by 94
Andersson, J., Hojcková, K., & Sandén, B. A. (2023) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2023.100786 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Markard, J., Hekkert, M., & Jacobsson, S.
- Venue
- Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 16
- Pages
- 76-86
- ISSN
- 2210-4224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W951709261
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.006
- The paper
- Markard, J., Hekkert, M., & Jacobsson, S. (2015). The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
