Cited by 92

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of inter-sectoral dynamics in sustainability transitions: A comment on the transitions research agenda

Andersen, Allan Dahl, Steen, Markus, Mäkitie, Tuukka, Hanson, Jens, Thune, Taran M., Soppe, Birthe·2020·Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.009

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Andersen, A.D., Gulbrandsen, M. (under review). The innovation and industry dynamics of technology phase-out in sustainability transitions: Insights from diversifying petroleum supplier firms in Norway.
  2. Andersen, 2019, Multi-technology interaction in socio-technical transitions: how recent dynamics in HVDC technology can inform transition theories, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
  3. Asheim, 2002, Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘Sticky’ and global ‘Ubiquitous’ knowledge, J. Technol. Transf., 27
  4. Bergek, 2008, Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis, Res. Policy, 37, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Boschma, 2017, Towards a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies, Reg. Stud., 51, 31, 10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460 · DOI
  6. Carlsson, 2016, Industrial dynamics: a review of the literature 1990–2009, Ind. Innov., 23, 1, 10.1080/13662716.2015.1120658 · DOI
  7. Castellacci, 2008, Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 75, 984, 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.09.002 · DOI
  8. Dosi, 1988, Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation, J. Econ. Lit., 26
  9. Geels, 2017, Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization, Science, 357, 1242, 10.1126/science.aao3760 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hansen, 2015, The geography of sustainability transitions: review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 17, 92, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001 · DOI
  11. MacKinnon, 2019, Path creation, global production networks and regional development: a comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector, Prog. Plann., 130, 1, 10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001 · DOI
  12. Malhotra, 2019, The role of inter-sectoral learning in knowledge development and diffusion: case studies on three clean energy technologies, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 146, 464, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.018 · DOI
  13. Markard, 2018, The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy, Nat. Energy, 3, 628, 10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7 · DOI
  14. Mathews, 2013, The renewable energies technology surge: A new techno-economic paradigm in the making?, Futures, 46, 10, 10.1016/j.futures.2012.12.001 · DOI
  15. Meadowcroft, 2011, Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 1, 70, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003 · DOI
  16. Mäkitie, 2018, Established sectors expediting clean technology industries? The Norwegian oil and gas sector’s influence on offshore wind power, J. Clean. Prod., 177, 813, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.209 · DOI
  17. Neffke, 2011, How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions, Econ. Geogr., 87, 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Pavitt, 1984, Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Res. Policy, 13, 343, 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0 · DOI
  19. Schlaile, 2017, Innovation systems for transformations towards sustainability? Taking the normative dimension seriously, Sustainability, 9, 2253, 10.3390/su9122253 · DOI
  20. Schot, 2018, Deep transitions: emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality, Res. Policy, 47, 1045, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.009 · DOI
  21. Smith, 2000, Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy, Enterp. Innov. Manag. Stud., 1, 73, 10.1080/146324400363536 · DOI
  22. Stankiewicz, 1991, On the nature, function and composition of technological systems, J. Evol. Econ., 1, 93, 10.1007/BF01224915 · DOI
  23. Stephan, 2017, The sectoral configuration of technological innovation systems: patterns of knowledge development and diffusion in the lithium-ion battery technology in Japan, Res. Policy, 46, 709, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.009 · DOI
  24. Vona, 2019, Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it, Clim. Policy, 19, 524, 10.1080/14693062.2018.1532871 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 92

Metadata

Authors
Andersen, A. D., Steen, M., Mäkitie, T., Hanson, J., Thune, T. M., & Soppe, B.
Venue
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
34
Pages
348-351
ISSN
2210-4224
Cited by
92
References
3
Language
en
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd (295021)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of inter-sectoral dynamics in sustainability transitions: A comment on the transitions research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.009
The paper
Andersen, A. D., Steen, M., Mäkitie, T., Hanson, J., Thune, T. M., & Soppe, B. (2020). The role of inter-sectoral dynamics in sustainability transitions: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.009