Cited by 40Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introduction to the special issue on just food system transition: Tackling inequalities for sustainability

Open access
Kaljonen, Minna, Kortetmäki, Teea, Tribaldos, Theresa·2023·Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions

Abstract

This special issue builds understanding of just transitions by looking at specific dynamics in food system transitions. The articles in the special issue apply a multi-dimensional understanding of justice, which stress that in addition to distributional matters, also recognition and procedural justice require attention in transitions. The current injustices in the food system emphasize the interrelatedness of these dimensions. The special issue includes eight articles that scrutinize food system transition in various contexts from Finland to Brazil and from farm-level decision-making to the UN food system summit. The papers demonstrate the focality of recognition justice for interpreting contestations around sustainability transitions. They also draw attention to existing power imbalances that affect the alternative visions of sustainability and need attention for procedural justice. In future, salient power analysis and normative frameworks are required to spot trade-offs and blind spots in just transition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eist.2022.100688

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Kaljonen, M., Kortetmäki, T., & Tribaldos, T.
Affiliations
  • Finnish Environment Institute (FI)
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Kaljonen, Minna
Venue
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
46
Pages
100688
ISSN
2210-4224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312109351
Cited by
40
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
  • Strategic Research Council
  • Academy of Finland (327269, 327284, 327371)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
just transition, food system transformation, recognition justice, procedural justice, distributive justice, sustainability transitions, power imbalance, food system inequality, UN Food Systems Summit, farm-level decision making, normative framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review