CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 94

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The rise of China's new energy vehicle lithium-ion battery industry: The coevolution of battery technological innovation systems and policies

Gong, Huiwen, Hansen, Teis·2023·Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2022.100689
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eist.2022.100689

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 1 Coevolution of TIS development and policies: an analytical framework.
Fig. 1 Coevolution of TIS development and policies: an analytical framework.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Annual EV battery production volume. Source: China Industrial Association of Power Sources.
Fig. 2 Annual EV battery production volume. Source: China Industrial Association of Power Sources.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Coevolution of battery TIS and policies.
Fig. 3 Coevolution of battery TIS and policies.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF
Appendix 4. Battery installation volume in cars: NMC and LFP compared
Appendix 4. Battery installation volume in cars: NMC and LFP comparedCC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Bach, 2020, Implementing maritime battery-electric and hydrogen solutions: a technological innovation systems analysis, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 87, 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102492 · DOI
  2. Bach, 2021, Blending new and old in sustainability transitions: technological alignment between fossil fuels and biofuels in Norwegian coastal shipping, Energ. Res. Soc. Sci., 74, 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101957 · DOI
  3. Bergek, 2019, Technological innovation systems: a review of recent findings and suggestions for future research
  4. Bergek, 2015, Technological innovation systems in contexts: conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 16, 51, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bergek, 2008, Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis, Res. Policy, 37, 407, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Beuse, 2018, A “technology-smart” battery policy strategy for Europe, Science, 361, 1075, 10.1126/science.aau2516 · DOI
  7. Binz, 2016, The thorny road to technology legitimation — Institutional work for potable water reuse in California, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 103, 249, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.005 · DOI
  8. Binz, 2012, Conceptualizing leapfrogging with spatially coupled innovation systems: the case of onsite wastewater treatment in China, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 79, 155, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.016 · DOI
  9. Carlsson, 1991, On the nature, function and composition of technological systems, J. Evol. Econ., 1, 93, 10.1007/BF01224915 · DOI
  10. Cashore, 2007, Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest forestry, Am. J. Pol. Sci., 51, 532, 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Chen, 2016, An institutionalized policy-making mechanism: china's return to techno-industrial policy, Res. Policy, 45, 2138, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.014 · DOI
  12. Dewald, 2016, Why more sustainable cements failed so far? Disruptive innovations and their barriers in a basic industry, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 19, 15, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.10.001 · DOI
  13. Duygan, 2019, A heuristic for conceptualizing and uncovering the determinants of agency in socio-technical transitions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 33, 13, 10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.002 · DOI
  14. Flanagan, 2016, Four dangers in innovation policy studies-and how to avoid them, Indust. Innov., 23, 177, 10.1080/13662716.2016.1146126 · DOI
  15. Furtado, 2020, Of actors, functions, and fuels: exploring a second generation ethanol transition from a technological innovation systems perspective in Brazil, Energ. Res. Soc. Sci., 70, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101706 · DOI
  16. Grillitsch, 2019, Innovation policy for system wide transformation: the case of Strategic Innovation Programs (SIPs) in Sweden, Res. Policy, 48, 1048, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004 · DOI
  17. Haelg, 2020, The role of actors in the policy design process: introducing design coalitions to explain policy output, Policy Sci., 53, 309, 10.1007/s11077-019-09365-z · DOI
  18. Hall, 1993, Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain, Comp. Polit., 275, 10.2307/422246 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hawkey, 2012, District heating in the UK: a Technological Innovation Systems analysis, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 5, 19, 10.1016/j.eist.2012.10.005 · DOI
  20. Hansen, 2020, How many firms benefit from a window of opportunity? Knowledge spillovers, industry characteristics, and catching up in the Chinese biomass power plant industry, Indust. Corp. Change, 29, 1211, 10.1093/icc/dtaa008 · DOI
  21. Hekkert, 2007, Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 74, 413, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002 · DOI
  22. Jacobsson, 2006, A framework for guiding policy-makers intervening in emerging innovation systems in ‘catching-up'countries, Eur. J. Dev. Res., 18, 687, 10.1080/09578810601094902 · DOI
  23. Jacobsson, 2017, Improving the European Commission's analytical base for designing instrument mixes in the energy sector: market failures versus system weaknesses, Energ. Res. Soc. Sci., 33, 11, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.009 · DOI
  24. Jacobsson, 2013, Mechanisms blocking the dynamics of the European offshore wind energy innovation system–Challenges for policy intervention, Energy Policy, 63, 1182, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.077 · DOI
  25. Kern, 2015, Engaging with the politics, agency and structures in the technological innovation systems approach, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 67, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.001 · DOI
  26. Kivimaa, 2016, Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions, Res. Policy, 45, 205, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008 · DOI
  27. Ko, 2021, Carbon capture and storage in South Africa: a technological innovation system with a political economy focus, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 166, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120633 · DOI
  28. Kushnir, 2020, Adopting hydrogen direct reduction for the Swedish steel industry: a technological innovation system (TIS) study, J. Clean. Prod., 242, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118185 · DOI
  29. Lema, 2020, Green windows of opportunity: latecomer development in the age of transformation toward sustainability, Indust. Corp. Change, 29, 1193, 10.1093/icc/dtaa044 · DOI
  30. Li, 2018, China's manufacturing locus in 2025: with a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 135, 66, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028 · DOI
  31. Li, 2021, China's advisory committees and expert advice for policymaking, Decision Making, 77, 100
  32. Liu, 2011, China's innovation policies: evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory, Res. Policy, 40, 917, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.005 · DOI
  33. Liu, 2017, Beyond catch-up—can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle income trap?, Sci. Public Policy, 44, 656, 10.1093/scipol/scw092 · DOI
  34. Madsen, 2022, Axes of contestation in sustainability transitions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 45, 246, 10.1016/j.eist.2022.11.001 · DOI
  35. Malhotra, 2019, The role of inter-sectoral learning in knowledge development and diffusion: case studies on three clean energy technologies, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 146, 464, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.018 · DOI
  36. Malhotra, 2021, How do new use environments influence a technology's knowledge trajectory? A patent citation network analysis of lithium-ion battery technology, Res. Policy, 50, 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104318 · DOI
  37. Markard, 2015, The technological innovation systems framework: response to six criticisms, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 16, 76, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.006 · DOI
  38. Markard, 2008, Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework, Res. Policy, 37, 596, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004 · DOI
  39. McDowall, 2013, The development of wind power in China, Europe and the USA: how have policies and innovation system activities co-evolved?, Tech. Anal. Strat. Manage., 25, 163, 10.1080/09537325.2012.759204 · DOI
  40. Musiolik, 2011, Creating and shaping innovation systems: formal networks in the innovation system for stationary fuel cells in Germany, Energy Policy, 39, 1909, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.052 · DOI
  41. Musiolik, 2020, Creating innovation systems: how resource constellations affect the strategies of system builders, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 153, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.002 · DOI
  42. 2017, Policy networks in energy transitions: the cases of carbon capture and storage and offshore wind in Norway, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 118, 80, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.004 · DOI
  43. Ouyang, 2015, New energy vehicle research and development in China, Sci. Tech. Rev.
  44. Perez, 2020, Technology characteristics and catching-up policies: solar energy technologies in Mexico, Energy Sustain. Dev., 56, 51, 10.1016/j.esd.2020.03.003 · DOI
  45. Randelli, 2017, Analysing the role of consumers within technological innovation systems: the case of alternative food networks, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 25, 94, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.001 · DOI
  46. Reichardt, 2016, Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 106, 11, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.029 · DOI
  47. Reichardt, 2017, Unpacking policy processes for addressing systemic problems in technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 80, 1217, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.280 · DOI
  48. Quitzow, 2017, Development trajectories in China's wind and solar energy industries: how technology-related differences shape the dynamics of industry localization and catching up, J. Clean. Prod., 158, 122, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.130 · DOI
  49. Stephan, 2017, The sectoral configuration of technological innovation systems: patterns of knowledge development and diffusion in the lithium-ion battery technology in Japan, Res. Policy, 46, 709, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.009 · DOI
  50. Suurs, 2009, Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: the case of biofuels in the Netherlands, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 76, 1003, 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.03.002 · DOI
  51. Tziva, M., Negro, S.O., Kalfagianni, A., & Hekkert, M.P. (2020). Understanding the protein transition: the rise of plant-based meat. · DOI
  52. Van Alphen, 2010, Accelerating the deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies by strengthening the innovation system, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 4, 396, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.09.019 · DOI
  53. Van der Loos, 2021, The co-evolution of innovation systems and context: offshore wind in Norway and the Netherlands, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 138, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110513 · DOI
  54. Wang, 2021, Science, technology and innovation policy in Russia and China–Mapping and comparisons in objectives, instruments and implementation, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 162, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120386 · DOI
  55. Zenglein, 2019, Evolving made in China 2025, MERICS Papers on China, 78
  56. Zhejiang Securities (2021). Industry Review Report: new Energy Vehicles and Lithium-ion battery Series One: steady Monthly Installed Growth, Strong Return of Lithium Iron Phosphate.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gong, H., & Hansen, T.
Venue
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
46
Pages
100689
ISSN
2210-4224
DOI
10.1016/j.eist.2022.100689
Cited by
94
References
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
European Union

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review