Cited by 116Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Management and Crop Yield

Do soil organic carbon levels affect potential yields and nitrogen use efficiency? An analysis of winter wheat and spring barley field trials

Oelofse, Myles, Markussen, Bo, Knudsen, Leif, Schelde, Kirsten, Olesen, Jørgen E., Jensen, Lars Stoumann, Bruun, Sander·2015·European Journal of Agronomy

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is broadly recognised as an important parameter affecting soil quality, and can therefore contribute to improving a number of soil properties that influence crop yield. Previous research generally indicates that soil organic carbon has positive effects on crop yields, but in many studies it is difficult to separate the effect of nutrients from the effect of SOC in itself. The aim of this study was to analyze whether the SOC content, in itself, has a significant effect on potential yields of commonly grown cereals across a wider range of soil types in Denmark. The study draws on historical data sets from the Danish national field trials consisting of 560 winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) trials and 309 spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) trials conducted over the past 20 and 17 years, respectively. We hypothesised that for these two crops, the potential grain yield, the yield with no fertiliser N application and the N use efficiency would be positively affected by SOC level. A statistical model was developed to explore relationships between SOC and potential yield, yields at zero N application and N use efficiency (NUE). The model included a variety of variables and aimed to elucidate the sole effect of SOC by controlling for potential confounding variables. No significant effect of SOC on potential winter wheat was found, whilst for spring barley, only for the course sandy loam soil type was a borderline significantly positive effect of SOC on poten…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eja.2015.02.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oelofse et al. (2015) found unclear effects across eight soil types, with borderline positive effects on coarse sandy loam and fine sandy clay loam soils but negative effects on fine sandy soils.

    “Only one study (Oelofse et al., 2015) found unclear effects across eight soil types, with borderline positive effects on coarse sandy loam and fine sandy clay loam soils but negative effects on fine sandy soils.”

    From Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon (2023) · cites this paper as Oelofse et al., 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oelofse, M., Markussen, B., Knudsen, L., Schelde, K., Olesen, J. E., Jensen, L. S., & Bruun, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Knowledge Centre for Agriculture (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Oelofse, Myles
Venue
European Journal of Agronomy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
66
Pages
62-73
ISSN
1161-0301 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973845594
Cited by
116
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Agronomy (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Danish Environmental Ministry
  • EU-FP7 SmartSOIL (289694)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
soil organic carbon, crop yield, nitrogen use efficiency, winter wheat, spring barley, cereal yield, soil type, sandy soil, soil quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review