Symptom Interval in Young People with Bone Cancer
Abstract
Symptom interval (SI), the time from first symptom/sign to diagnosis and initiation of treatment, appears to be principally influenced by tumour biology. Whether the age of the patient, patient delay, professional delay and access to health professionals influences the SI in bone tumours was investigated in this study. 115 patients with newly diagnosed osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma were retrospectively reviewed. The median total SI for all bone tumours was 3.8 months (range 1-46 months). Patients older than 12 years had a longer SI (P = 0.05) and more patient delays (P = 0.02). Total SI and professional delays were longer if the General Practitioner was first seen compared with an Accident and Emergency Consultant (P = 0.02 and 0.02, respectively). However, SI did not influence overall and event-free survival in this series. Bone tumour patients have long SIs that are significantly affected by age and local health-care support systems. Early referral to specialists would help to alleviate anxiety and distress to the patient and family, even if currently delay does not influence outcome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children with bone tumors often present non-specific symptoms such as pain or fatigue, which can be easily labeled as minor or common concerns.
“For example, children with bone tumors often present non-specific symptoms, such as pain or fatigue, which can be easily labeled as minor or common concerns.”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [137]
Noticeable symptoms like a visible mass generally result in more prompt referrals and quicker diagnoses.
“On the other hand, noticeable symptoms, like a visible mass, generally result in more prompt referrals and quicker diagnoses [137].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [137]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bleyer, W. A. (2010) · The Cancer Journal · doi:10.1097/ppo.0b013e3181ff6509 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors
Yen, C., Epling, J. W., Rockwell, M., & Vaughn-Cooke, M. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16020347 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goyal, S., Roscoe, J., Ryder, W. D. J., Gattamaneni, H. R., & Eden, T. O. B.
- Affiliations
- The Christie Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Eden, T.O.B.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2280-2286
- ISSN
- 0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132221865
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
- Keywords
- bone cancer, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, patient delay, general practitioner referral, emergency department, health care access, event-free survival, youth
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Bone Neoplasms, Child, Child, Preschool, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Sarcoma, Ewing, Osteosarcoma, Time Factors, Survival Analysis, Early Diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review