Cited by 110Sarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsCardiac tumors and thrombi

Periosteal osteosarcoma – a European review of outcome

Grimer, Robert J., Bielack, Stefan, Flege, Silke, Cannon, Stephen R., Foleras, Gunnar, Andreeff, Ivan, Sokolov, Todor, Taminiau, Antonie +4 more·2005·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Periosteal osteosarcoma is a rare primary malignant bone tumour. Treatment is by surgical excision, but controversy remains about the value of chemotherapy. The members of the European Musculo Skeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS) collaborated to produce a dataset of 119 patients. The predominant site for the tumour was the femur, followed by the tibia. All but 2 patients underwent surgery, with 9 requiring amputation and the others having limb salvage. A total of 81 patients had chemotherapy, of whom 50 had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There was no standard chemotherapy regime, but all patients receiving chemotherapy were given doxorubicin combined with at least one other agent. The overall survival was 89% at 5 years and 83% at 10 years. Eight patients developed local recurrence, of whom 5 died. Survival was related to appearance of local recurrence (P < 0.0001) but no other single factor. The use of chemotherapy was not shown to be a prognostic factor, but was used in two-thirds of the patients in this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.052

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A small number of patients present with localized, lower-grade parosteal and periosteal lesions.

    “A small number of patients present with localized, lower-grade parosteal and periosteal lesions 109,110 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [110]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 110

Authors
Grimer, R. J., Bielack, S., Flege, S., Cannon, S. R., Foleras, G., Andreeff, I., Sokolov, T., Taminiau, A., Dominkus, M., San-Julian, M., Kollender, Y., & Gosheger, G.
Affiliations
  • Royal Orthopaedic Hospital (GB)
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (GB)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Grimer, Robert J.
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
41
Issue
18
Pages
2806-2811
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976417745
Cited by
110
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac tumors and thrombi
Keywords
periosteal osteosarcoma, primary malignant bone tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, doxorubicin, limb salvage, amputation, overall survival, local recurrence, prognostic factors, femur, tibia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Bone Neoplasms, Child, Europe, Female, Fibula, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Osteosarcoma, Tibia, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review