Cited by 68Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressSkin Protection and Aging

Intake of antioxidant nutrients and the risk of skin cancer

Open access
Heinen, Mirjam M., Hughes, Maria Celia, Ibiebele, Torukiri I., Marks, Geoffrey C., Green, Adèle C., van der Pols, Jolieke C.·2007·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

To investigate the associations between intake of antioxidant nutrients and risk of basal cell (BCC) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the skin, we carried out a prospective study among 1001 randomly selected adults living in an Australian community. Intake of antioxidants was estimated in 1996. Incident, histologically-confirmed BCC and SCC were recorded between 1996 and 2004. High dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin was associated with a reduced incidence of SCC in persons who had a history of skin cancer at baseline (highest versus lowest tertile, multivariable adjusted relative risk (RR)=0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.89; P for trend=0.02). In persons without a history of skin cancer at baseline, development of BCC was positively associated with intake of vitamins C and E from foods plus supplements (RR=3.1, 95% CI: 1.1-8.6; P for trend=0.03 and RR=2.6, 95% CI: 1.1-6.3; P for trend=0.02, respectively). In those with a skin cancer history at baseline, dietary intake in the second tertile for beta-carotene (multivariable adjusted RR=2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1) and for vitamin E (multivariable adjusted RR=2.1, 95% CI: 1.1-3.9) was associated with increased BCC risk, with no trend, and similar results were seen in those with a specific history of BCC. These data suggest quite different associations between antioxidant intake and SCC compared with BCC, consistent with other evidence of their different causal pathways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.09.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 68

Authors
Heinen, M. M., Hughes, M. C., Ibiebele, T. I., Marks, G. C., Green, A. C., & van der Pols, J. C.
Affiliations
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
43
Issue
18
Pages
2707-2716
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994805276
Cited by
68
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
antioxidant nutrients, skin cancer, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, lutein, zeaxanthin, vitamin C, vitamin E, beta-carotene, dietary intake, skin cancer history, cancer risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Antioxidants, Ascorbic Acid, Carcinoma, Basal Cell, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Carotenoids, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Queensland, Selenium, Skin Neoplasms, Vitamin E

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review