Intake of antioxidant nutrients and the risk of skin cancer
Open accessAbstract
To investigate the associations between intake of antioxidant nutrients and risk of basal cell (BCC) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the skin, we carried out a prospective study among 1001 randomly selected adults living in an Australian community. Intake of antioxidants was estimated in 1996. Incident, histologically-confirmed BCC and SCC were recorded between 1996 and 2004. High dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin was associated with a reduced incidence of SCC in persons who had a history of skin cancer at baseline (highest versus lowest tertile, multivariable adjusted relative risk (RR)=0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.89; P for trend=0.02). In persons without a history of skin cancer at baseline, development of BCC was positively associated with intake of vitamins C and E from foods plus supplements (RR=3.1, 95% CI: 1.1-8.6; P for trend=0.03 and RR=2.6, 95% CI: 1.1-6.3; P for trend=0.02, respectively). In those with a skin cancer history at baseline, dietary intake in the second tertile for beta-carotene (multivariable adjusted RR=2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1) and for vitamin E (multivariable adjusted RR=2.1, 95% CI: 1.1-3.9) was associated with increased BCC risk, with no trend, and similar results were seen in those with a specific history of BCC. These data suggest quite different associations between antioxidant intake and SCC compared with BCC, consistent with other evidence of their different causal pathways.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Heinen, M. M., Hughes, M. C., Ibiebele, T. I., Marks, G. C., Green, A. C., & van der Pols, J. C.
- Affiliations
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2707-2716
- ISSN
- 0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994805276
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Keywords
- antioxidant nutrients, skin cancer, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, lutein, zeaxanthin, vitamin C, vitamin E, beta-carotene, dietary intake, skin cancer history, cancer risk
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Antioxidants, Ascorbic Acid, Carcinoma, Basal Cell, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Carotenoids, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Queensland, Selenium, Skin Neoplasms, Vitamin E
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review