Case–control study of shift-work and breast cancer risk in Danish nurses: Impact of shift systems
Open accessAbstract
Background Working outside normal daytime hours is increasing worldwide and is now one of the most widespread potential carcinogenic occupational exposures. There is sufficient evidence in experimental animals that light exposure during the biologic night increases tumour growth and limited epidemiologic evidence that night shift-work cause breast cancer. Existing studies had crude definitions of shift-work and did not discriminate between shift-work systems (e.g. permanent versus rotating or evening versus night).Methods We performed an interview based nested case-control study within a nationwide cohort of Danish nurses, including detailed information on lifetime shift-work and potential confounders. Cases of primary breast cancer (n=310) were identified from the nationwide Danish Cancer Registry. Four control nurses were selected for each case by incidence density sampling. Odds rations (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by conditional logistic regression, with adjustment for potential confounders.Findings Overall, nurses who worked rotating shifts after midnight had a significantly increased OR (1.8; CI 1.2-2.8) for breast cancer compared to nurses with permanent day work. No association was found in a small group of nurses with evening work and no night work (OR=0.9; 0.4-1.9). The subgroup of nurses with periods of permanent night shift in addition to rotating night and day shifts experienced an OR of 2.9 (1.1-8.0). For nurses working after midnight compared to nurses never ending work before midnight, OR in the third tertile of cumulative number of shifts was 2.2 (1.5-3.2). In an analysis of different rotating shift systems, the highest OR (2.6; 1.8-3.8) was observed for long-term day-night rotating shifts.Interpretation The results provide further evidence that night shift-work may increase the risk for breast cancer and suggest that the largest impact on risk is associated with the most disruptive shifts.Funding Danish Cancer Society and National Programme of Environmental Health Research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Further evidence for the association between shift work and breast cancer point toward exposure to light at night as causal factor.
“Further evidence for the association between shift work and breast cancer 101, 102, 103, 104, 105 point toward exposure to light at night as causal factor, but see 106.”
From The inner clock-Blue light sets the human rhythm (2019) · cites this paper as [103]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 226
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Straif K, Baan R, Grosse Y, et al. Carcinogenicity of shiftwork, painting, and firefighting. Lancet Oncol 2007;8(12):1065-6.
- Authors
- Hansen, J., & Stevens, R. G.
- Affiliations
- Danish Cancer Society (DK)
- UConn Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hansen, Johnni
- ORCID
- Hansen, Johnni
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1722-1729
- ISSN
- 0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036749360
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 26.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Danish Cancer Society
- National Programme of Environmental Health Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- shift work, breast cancer, night shift work, rotating shifts, nurses, occupational cancer risk, light exposure, circadian rhythm disruption
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Middle Aged, Nurses, Risk Factors, Work Schedule Tolerance, Incidence, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review