Diabetes and Cancer: 5 Years Into the Recent Controversy
Abstract
Diabetes and cancer are common chronic disorders. The literature has long recognised that type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased incident risk of several cancer types, independent of the mutual risk factor, obesity. However, in June 2009, four papers were published simultaneously in Diabetologia, the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, raising questions of a link between diabetes therapies, notably the long-acting insulin analogue, glargine, and increased cancer risk. These papers awakened an unprecedented debate in the diabetes community, drawing in cancer experts and bringing together representatives from these two large, traditionally non-intersecting, biomedical communities. This Current Perspective summarises the events that followed the 'breaking news' from summer 2009: the pitfalls encountered; the increased mutual understanding between diabetes and cancer researchers; and the direction of current research. Much of the debate on the clinical impact of this controversy has been played out in the diabetes literature: here, we update the oncology readership.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Badrick and Renehan indicated that for preclinical in vivo studies doses ranged from x2 to x45 therapeutic doses and for in vitro studies concentrations ranged from x25 to x1000 higher than those observed in patients.
“A useful comparison of the doses of metformin used therapeutically versus pre-clinical studies was made by Badrick and Renehan, indicating that for pre-clinical studies done in vivo, the doses ranged from x2 to x45 therapeutic doses and that for studies done in vitro, concentrations ranged from x25 to x1000 higher than those observed in patients (161).”
From A Critical Review of the Evidence That Metformin Is a Putative Anti-Aging Drug That Enhances Healthspan and Extends Lifespan (2021) · cites this paper as [161]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Badrick, E., & Renehan, A. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Renehan, Andrew G.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2119-2125
- ISSN
- 0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036203072
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, cancer risk, glargine, long-acting insulin analogues, obesity
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Metformin, Neoplasms, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review