Cited by 53Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerCancer Risks and FactorsDiabetes Management and Research

Diabetes and Cancer: 5 Years Into the Recent Controversy

Badrick, Ellena, Renehan, Andrew G.·2014·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Diabetes and cancer are common chronic disorders. The literature has long recognised that type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased incident risk of several cancer types, independent of the mutual risk factor, obesity. However, in June 2009, four papers were published simultaneously in Diabetologia, the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, raising questions of a link between diabetes therapies, notably the long-acting insulin analogue, glargine, and increased cancer risk. These papers awakened an unprecedented debate in the diabetes community, drawing in cancer experts and bringing together representatives from these two large, traditionally non-intersecting, biomedical communities. This Current Perspective summarises the events that followed the 'breaking news' from summer 2009: the pitfalls encountered; the increased mutual understanding between diabetes and cancer researchers; and the direction of current research. Much of the debate on the clinical impact of this controversy has been played out in the diabetes literature: here, we update the oncology readership.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.04.032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Badrick and Renehan indicated that for preclinical in vivo studies doses ranged from x2 to x45 therapeutic doses and for in vitro studies concentrations ranged from x25 to x1000 higher than those observed in patients.

    “A useful comparison of the doses of metformin used therapeutically versus pre-clinical studies was made by Badrick and Renehan, indicating that for pre-clinical studies done in vivo, the doses ranged from x2 to x45 therapeutic doses and that for studies done in vitro, concentrations ranged from x25 to x1000 higher than those observed in patients (161).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 53

Authors
Badrick, E., & Renehan, A. G.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Renehan, Andrew G.
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
2119-2125
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036203072
Cited by
53
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cancer risk, glargine, long-acting insulin analogues, obesity
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Metformin, Neoplasms, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review