The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
European Research on Electrochemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (EURECA) project: Results of the treatment of skin cancer
Open accessAbstract
Electrochemotherapy is an effective and safe method for local treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous tumours, where electric pulses cause increased permeability of cell membranes in the tumour mass, enabling dramatically enhanced effectiveness of bleomycin and other hydrophilic drugs. Here, we report results of a European multi-institutional prospective study of the effectiveness of electrochemotherapy in the treatment of skin cancer of the head and neck (HN) area, where standard treatments had either failed or were not deemed suitable or declined by the patient. A total of 105 patients affected by primary or recurrent skin cancer of the HN area were enrolled; of these, 99 were eligible for evaluation of tumour response. By far, the majority (82%) were treated only once, and 18% of patients had a second treatment. The objective response was highest for basal cell carcinoma (97%) and for other histologies was 74%. Small, primary, and treatment-naive carcinomas responded significantly better (p < 0.05), as investigated by univariate analysis. Electrochemotherapy was well tolerated and led to a significant improvement of quality of life, estimated by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaires. At 1-year follow-up, the percentages of overall and disease-free survival were 76% and 89%, respectively. Electrochemotherapy is an effective option for skin cancers of the HN area and can be considered a feasible alternative to standard treatments when such an alternative is appropriate. The precise role for electrochemotherapy in the treatment algorithm for non-melanoma skin cancer of the HN region requires data from future randomised controlled studies. (ISRCTN registry N. 30427).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hawker, G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., & French, M. (2011) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.20543 · Cited by 4,924
Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma
Telfer, N. R., Colver, G. B., & Morton, C. A. (2008) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08666.x · Cited by 960
Cited by
Stratigos, A. J., Garbe, C., Dessinioti, C., Lebbe, C., Bataille, V., Bastholt, L., Dreno, B., Concetta Fargnoli, M., Forsea, A. M., Frenard, C., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.008 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertino, G., Sersa, G., De Terlizzi, F., Occhini, A., Plaschke, C. C., Groselj, A., Langdon, C., Grau, J. J., McCaul, J. A., Heuveling, D., Cemazar, M., Strojan, P., de Bree, R., Leemans, C. R., Wessel, I., Gehl, J., & Benazzo, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 63
- Pages
- 41-52
- ISSN
- 0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4254323572
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European Research on Electrochemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (EURECA) project: Results of the treatment of skin cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.05.001
- The paper
- Bertino, G., Sersa, G., De Terlizzi, F., Occhini, A., Plaschke, C. C., Groselj, A., Langdon, C., Grau, J. J., McCaul, J. A., Heuveling, D., Cemazar, M., Strojan, P., de Bree, R., Leemans, C. R., Wessel, I., Gehl, J., & Benazzo, M. (2016). European Research on Electrochemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (EURECA) project: Results of the treatment of skin cancer. European Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.05.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.