Cited by 255Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Immune-related adverse events predict the therapeutic efficacy of anti–PD-1 antibodies in cancer patients

Rogado, J., Sánchez-Torres, J.M., Romero-Laorden, N., Ballesteros, A.I., Pacheco-Barcia, V., Ramos-Leví, A., Arranz, R., Lorenzo, A. +8 more·2019·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Background Cancer immune therapy has shown remarkable benefit in the treatment of a range of cancer types, although it may initiate autoimmune-related disorders in some patients. We have attempted to establish whether the incidence of irAEs after the use of anti-PD-1 antibodies nivolumab or pembrolizumab in advanced malignancies is associated with anti-PD-1 treatment efficacy.Patients and methods We studied patients treated with single-agent nivolumab or pembrolizumab for advanced cancer. irAEs (immune-related adverse events) were identified clinically and graded as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Efficacy was evaluated with objective response rate (ORR, immune-Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST] criteria) progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tests were performed to determine the association between irAEs and ORR, PFS or OS.Results We identified 106 patients. Primary diagnoses were lung cancer (n = 77), melanoma (n = 8), head and neck carcinoma (n = 7), renal carcinoma (n = 5), Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 3), urothelial carcinoma (n = 3) and gallbladder adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and Merkel cell carcinoma (n = 1 each). IrAEs were observed in 40 patients (37.7%). The most frequent irAEs were hypothyroidism (n = 15), nephritis (n = 5) and hyperthyroidism (n = 4). Objective response was observed in 44 patients (41.5%), and median PFS was 5.5 months (0.5-31 months). Thirty-three of the 40 patients with irAEs had objective response (82.5%) in contrast with 11 of the 66 cases without irAEs (16.6%) (OR 23.5, P < 0.000001). PFS in patients with irAEs was 10 months and 3 months in those without irAEs (HR 2.2, P = 0.016). OS in patients with irAEs was 32 months and 22 in those without irAEs, without statistically significant differences.Conclusion In advanced cancer treated with single-agent anti-PD-1 antibodies, patients with irAEs showed a markedly improved efficacy over patients without irAEs (ORR of 82.5% and PFS of 10 months vs ORR of 16.6% and PFS of 3 months). Future studies of anti-PD-1 immune-therapy should address this association to explore the underlying biological mechanisms of efficacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.10.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across disease sites, patients who experience IRAEs while on therapy with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies have been documented to experience improved outcomes as measured by overall response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival.

    “Across disease sites, patients who experience IRAEs while on therapy with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies have been documented to experience improved outcomes as measured by overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [13–20].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 255

Authors
Rogado, J., Sánchez-Torres, J. M., Romero-Laorden, N., Ballesteros, A. I., Pacheco-Barcia, V., Ramos-Leví, A., Arranz, R., Lorenzo, A., Gullón, P., Donnay, O., Adrados, M., Costas, P., Aspa, J., Alfranca, A., Mondéjar, R., & Colomer, R.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES)
  • Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
Corresponding author
Colomer, R.
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
109
Pages
21-27
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912725678
Cited by
255
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 29
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (JR 17/00007, PI17/008, PIE15/00068)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
immune-related adverse events, anti-PD-1, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer immunotherapy, treatment efficacy, objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, hypothyroidism, nephritis, hyperthyroidism, advanced cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, head and neck cancer, renal carcinoma, Hodgkin's disease
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Nivolumab, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunotherapy, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review