Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients with metastatic or locally advanced chondrosarcoma: Results of a non-comparative, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicentre phase II study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: This multi-cohort trial explored the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with advanced sarcomas of bone origin; this report details the cohort of patients with metastatic or locally advanced chondrosarcoma (CS), progressing after prior chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with CS, progressing despite prior standard therapy, were randomised (2:1) to receive regorafenib or placebo. Patients on placebo could crossover to receive regorafenib after centrally confirmed progressive disease. The primary endpoint was progression-free rate (PFR) at 12 weeks. With one-sided α of 0.05, and 80% power, at least 16/24 progression-free patients at 12 weeks were needed for success (P0 = 50%, P1 = 75%). RESULTS: From September 2014 to February 2019, 46 patients were included in the CS cohort, and 40 patients were evaluable for efficacy: 16 on placebo and 24 on regorafenib. Thirteen patients (54.2%; 95% CI [35.8%-[) were non-progressive at 12 weeks on regorafenib versus 5 (31.3%; 95% CI [13.2%-[);) on placebo. Median PFS was 19.9 weeks on regorafenib, and 8.0 on placebo. Fourteen placebo patients crossed over to regorafenib after progression. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events on regorafenib included hypertension (12%), asthenia (8%), thrombocytopenia (8%) and diarrhoea (8%). One episode of fatal liver dysfunction occurred on regorafenib. CONCLUSION: Although the primary endpoint was not met statistically in this small randomised cohort, there is modest evidence to suggest that regorafenib might slow disease progression in patients with metastatic CS after the failure of prior chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02389244).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regorafenib demonstrated a median progression-free survival of 14.8 weeks in Ewing sarcoma, 3.6 months in osteosarcoma, and a nonprogressive rate at 3 months of 54% in chondrosarcoma, significantly better than placebo.
“demonstrating a median progression‐free survival (PFS) of 14.8 weeks in Ewing sarcoma, 10 a median PFS of 3.6 months in osteosarcoma, 11 and a nonprogressive rate at 3 months of 54%, significantly better than results with placebo in chondrosarcoma. 12”
From Nivolumab and sunitinib in patients with advanced bone sarcomas: A multicenter, single‐arm, phase 2 trial (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Duffaud, F., Italiano, A., Bompas, E., Rios, M., Penel, N., Mir, O., Piperno-Neumann, S., Chevreau, C., Delcambre, C., Bertucci, F., Boudou-Rouquette, P., Cancel, M., Perrin, C., Saada-Bouzid, E., Monard, L., Schiffler, C., Chaigneau, L., Hervieu, A., Collard, O., Bouvier, C., Vidal, V., Chabaud, S., & Blay, J.-Y.
- Affiliations
- Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
- Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
- Institut Curie (FR)
- Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole (FR)
- Centre François Baclesse (FR)
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR)
- Centre Eugène Marquis (FR)
- UniCancer Group (FR)
- Centre Léon Bérard (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR)
- Centre Georges François Leclerc (FR)
- Institute Cancer De La Loire Lucien Neuwirth (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Duffaud, Florence
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 150
- Pages
- 108-118
- ISSN
- 0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159643156
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 325 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- European Journal of Cancer (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Bayer Healthcare
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Oncology and Treatments
- Keywords
- regorafenib, chondrosarcoma, metastatic chondrosarcoma, progression-free rate, progression-free survival, treatment-related adverse events, liver dysfunction
- MeSH terms
- Progression-Free Survival, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Bone Neoplasms, Chondrosarcoma, Double-Blind Method, Female, France, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phenylurea Compounds, Pyridines, Time Factors, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review