Predictive value of radiological response, pathological response and relapse-free survival for overall survival in neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials: pooled analysis of 29 clinical trials
Open accessAbstract
Background An increasing number of clinical trials are being conducted exploring the efficacy of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors. Surrogate end-points for overall survival (OS) are urgently needed. Methods Phase II or III trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy that reported data on OS and surrogate end-points were identified from January 1, 2000, to November 25, 2022. Individual patient data, and trial-level data were requested from corresponding authors or extracted from eligible trials. At the individual level, correlations between radiological and pathological response and OS were measured by the Cox model and quantified by hazard ratio (HR). C-statistic was used to quantify the predictive performance of radiological and pathological response for OS. The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) between RFS and OS was evaluated by a bivariate survival model. Results A total of 29 trials reporting 2901 patients were included. ORR correlated with improved OS (3-year OS: 87.0% versus 70.4% for ORR versus non-ORR, respectively; HR, 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17–0.68). The HRs for OS in patients achieving MPR and pCR were 0.24 (95% CI, 0.12–0.46) and 0.13 (95% CI, 0.05–0.36). The survival benefit maintained after adjusting tumour type. C-statistics of ORR, MPR and pCR were 0.63, 0.63 and 0.65, respectively. The strength of association between RFS and OS was strong (R 2 = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.79–0.94). Conclusions These findings suggest that ORR, MPR, pCR and RFS are valid predictors for OS when using neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, MPR, pCR and RFS may be the most optimal surrogates for OS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These findings mirror the evidence from a pooled analysis of neoadjuvant trials in patients with other oncological indications, in which up to 27% of patients without a radiological overall response were found to have a major pathological response on surgical specimens.
“These findings mirror the evidence from a pooled analysis of neoadjuvant trials in patients with other oncological indications, in which up to 27% of patients without an radiological overall response were found to have a major pathological response on surgical specimens.28”
From Pathological response following neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a cross-trial, patient-level analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Cites
Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Schmid, P., Cortes, J., Pusztai, L., McArthur, H., Kümmel, S., Bergh, J., Denkert, C., Park, Y. H., Hui, R., Harbeck, N., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1910549 · Cited by 3,270 · see citing works
Neoadjuvant Nivolumab plus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer
Forde, P. M., Spicer, J., Lu, S., Provencio, M., Mitsudomi, T., Awad, M. M., Felip, E., Broderick, S. R., Brahmer, J. R., Swanson, S. J., et al. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2202170 · Cited by 2,825 · see citing works
Self-citationMittendorf, E. A., Zhang, H., Barrios, C. H., Saji, S., Jung, K. H., Hegg, R., Koehler, A., Sohn, J., Iwata, H., Telli, M. L., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31953-x · Cited by 1,083 · see citing works
Provencio, M., Nadal, E., Insa, A., García-Campelo, M. R., Casal-Rubio, J., Dómine, M., Majem, M., Rodríguez-Abreu, D., Martínez-Martí, A., De Castro Carpeño, J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30453-8 · Cited by 841 · see citing works
Self-citationNeoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma
Amaria, R. N., Reddy, S. M., Tawbi, H. A., Davies, M. A., Ross, M. I., Glitza, I. C., Cormier, J. N., Lewis, C., Hwu, W.-J., Hanna, E., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0197-1 · Cited by 835 · see citing works
Oba, K., Paoletti, X., Alberts, S., Bang, Y.-J., Benedetti, J., Bleiberg, H., Catalano, P., Lordick, F., Michiels, S., Morita, S., et al. (2013) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djt270 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
D'Alessio, A., Stefanini, B., Blanter, J., Adegbite, B., Crowley, F., Yip, V., Slater, S., Fulgenzi, C. A. M., Celsa, C., Manfredi, G. F., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00457-1 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nie, R., Chen, F., Provencio, M., Wang, Y., van den Ende, T., van Laarhoven, H. W. M., Yuan, S., Pless, M., Hayoz, S., Zhou, Z., Li, Y., Rothschild, S. I., & Cai, M.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES)
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
- Kantonsspital Winterthur (CH)
- Swiss Group For Clinical Cancer Research (CH)
- University Hospital of Basel (CH)
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Yuanfang
- Rothschild, Sacha I.
- Cai, Muyan
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-06
- Volume
- 186
- Pages
- 211-221
- ISSN
- 0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4327718600
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation (Y-tongshu2021/qn-0227)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (201803040019, 81730072, 81672407, 81772589, 81902411, 82103586, 81872001)
- Schweizerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Klinische Krebsforschung
- Health Medical Collaborative Innovation Program of Guangzhou (201803040019)
- Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project (201803040019, 202201010885)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- neoadjuvant immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, overall survival, surrogate endpoints, radiological response, pathological response, complete response, major pathological response, relapse-free survival, predictive value, individual patient data
- MeSH terms
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Humans, Immunotherapy, Biomarkers, Proportional Hazards Models, Neoadjuvant Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review