Cited by 48Slime Mold and Myxomycetes ResearchCellular transport and secretionAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Phagocyte meets prey: Uptake, internalization, and killing of bacteria by Dictyostelium amoebae

Clarke, Margaret, Maddera, Lucinda·2006·European Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Dictyostelium cells are professional phagocytes that avidly consume bacteria, their natural prey. Fluorescent probes have allowed us to monitor the initial steps in this process in living cells. Using probes that bind to F-actin, we have visualized the assembly and disassembly of actin filaments responsible for extending the phagocytic cup to engulf a bacterium, and, after the phagosome has sealed, the assembly of new actin filaments to propel the phagosome away from the site of uptake. Using bacteria expressing fluorescent proteins that are susceptible to proteolysis, we have monitored the loss of that fluorescent signal and the staining of the bacterial contents with neutral red, indicating permeabilization of the bacterial cell wall and acidification of the cytoplasm. We find that acidification occurs during a period of microtubule-based transport that promotes fusion of the phagosome with microtubule-associated acidic endosomes. Actin-powered phagosome internalization, transport of the phagosome along microtubules, proteolysis and acidification of bacterial contents, all typically occur within the first six or seven minutes after formation of the phagosome. Thus, tracking individual phagosomes has revealed that early steps in phagosome maturation occur much more rapidly than had been inferred from previous population studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejcb.2006.05.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarke, M., & Maddera, L.
Affiliations
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Clarke, Margaret
Venue
European Journal of Cell Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
85
Issue
9-10
Pages
1001-1010
ISSN
0171-9335 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973298030
Cited by
48
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
Dictyostelium, phagocytosis, phagosome maturation, F-actin, phagocytic cup, phagosome acidification, bacterial killing, bacterial proteolysis, fluorescent probes
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Dictyostelium, Actin Cytoskeleton, Microtubules, Phagocytosis, Phagosomes, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Protozoan Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review