The DOI matches its Crossref record.
First experiences with the da Vinci™ operating robot in thoracic surgery☆
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The da Vinci surgical robotic system was purchased at our institution in June 2001. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the applicability of the da Vinci operation robot for general thoracic procedures. METHODS: The da Vinci surgical system consists of a console connected to a surgical arm cart, a manipulator unit with two instrument arms and a central arm to guide the endoscope. The surgical instruments are introduced via special ports and attached to the arms of the robot. The surgeon, sitting at the console, triggers highly sensitive motion sensors that transfer the surgeon's movements to the tip of the instruments. The so-called 'EndoWrist technology' offers seven degrees of movement, thus exceeding the capacity of a surgeon's hand in open surgery. We evaluated the role of the robot for several thoracic procedures such as thymectomies, fundoplications, esophageal dissections, resection of mediastinal masses and a pulmonary lobectomy. RESULTS: A total of 10 thymectomies, 16 fundoplications, 4 esophageal dissections, 5 extirpations of benign mediastinal masses and 1 right lower lobectomy was performed with the robot. One resection of a paravertebral neurogenic tumor had to be converted due to surgical problems. A lesion to a left recurrent laryngeal nerve caused transient hoarseness after the extirpation of an ectopic parathyroid in the aortopulmonary window in one patient. The postoperative courses were uneventful and patients were discharged between postoperative days 3 and 8 (with the exception of patients who underwent dissection for esophageal cancer and the patient with conversion to an open access). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced general thoracic procedures can be performed safely with the da Vinci robot allowing precise dissection in remote and difficult-to-reach areas. This benefit becomes evident most elegantly in thymectomies, which at our institution have become a routine procedure with the robot. The rigid anatomy of the chest seems to be an ideal condition for robotic surgery. A major limitation for robotic surgery is the lack of more appropriate instruments. This disadvantage becomes most evident in pulmonary lobectomies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms
Cerfolio, R. J., Bryant, A. S., Skylizard, L., & Minnich, D. J. (2011) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.022 · Cited by 337
Medical Robots: Current Systems and Research Directions
Beasley, R. A. (2012) · Journal of Robotics · doi:10.1155/2012/401613 · Cited by 312
Dentronics: Towards robotics and artificial intelligence in dentistry
Grischke, J., Johannsmeier, L., Eich, L., Griga, L., & Haddadin, S. (2020) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.021 · Cited by 221
Service robots in hospitals: new perspectives on niche evolution and technology affordances
Mettler, T., Sprenger, M., & Winter, R. (2017) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/s41303-017-0046-1 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Bodner, J., Wykypiel, H., Wetscher, G., & Schmid, T.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 844-851
- ISSN
- 1010-7940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151640591
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First experiences with the da Vinci™ operating robot in thoracic surgery☆. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.02.001
- The paper
- Bodner, J., Wykypiel, H., Wetscher, G., & Schmid, T. (2004). First experiences with the da Vinci™ operating robot in thoracic surgery☆. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.02.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.