Cited by 69Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Influence of diabetes on the survival of patients hospitalized with heart failure: a 12-year study

Varela-Roman, Alfonso, Shamagian, Lilian Grigorian, Caballero, Eduardo Barge, Ramos, Pilar Mazon, Veloso, Pedro Rigueiro, Gonzalez-Juanatey, Jose Ramon·2005·European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients, focussing specifically on aetiology and patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVSF), which to date has not been fully investigated. METHOD AND RESULTS: 1659 Patients hospitalized for HF between 1991 and 2002 in the Cardiology Department of a tertiary hospital, aged 69+/-12 years, 60% male were studied prospectively. Arterial hypertension was present in 54% of patients, DM in 26% and ischaemic cardiomyopathy in 51%. A survival analysis performed in April 2003 showed that DM worsens the prognosis of the whole group (median survival (MS): 3.6 vs. 5.4 years; p<0.001), of ischaemic and non-ischaemic patients (MS: 3.8 vs. 4.9 years; p=0.13 and 3.6 vs. 6.0 years; p<0.001, respectively). A similar effect of DM was shown in patients with preserved LVSF (MS: 3.8 vs. 5.8 years; p=0.03) and in patients with impaired LVSF (3.6 vs. 6.3 years; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: DM increases mortality among HF patients with preserved and impaired LVSF and those without ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.01.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two smaller population-based studies in the United States and France and one Spanish single-centre study suggested that diabetes was only associated with higher mortality in those with non-ischaemic aetiology.

    “These consistent findings conflict with two smaller population-based studies in the United States 29 and France 97 and one Spanish single-centre study 101 of patients hospitalized with HF, which suggested that diabetes was only associated with higher mortality in those with non-ischaemic aetiology.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 69

Authors
Varela-Roman, A., Shamagian, L. G., Caballero, E. B., Ramos, P. M., Veloso, P. R., & Gonzalez-Juanatey, J. R.
Affiliations
Santiago de Compostela
Venue
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2005-08-01
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
859-864
ISSN
  • 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-0844
OpenAlex
W2010601976
Cited by
69
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, heart failure, prognosis, survival, preserved left ventricular systolic function, ischemic cardiomyopathy, hypertension, mortality
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Stroke Volume, Survival Analysis, Myocardial Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review