Cited by 44Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBody Composition Measurement TechniquesPregnancy-related medical research

Maternal body fluid composition in uncomplicated pregnancies and preeclampsia: a bioelectrical impedance analysis

Staelens, Anneleen S., Vonck, Sharona, Molenberghs, Geert, Malbrain, Manu L.N.G., Gyselaers, Wilfried·2016·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Objectives Body fluid composition changes during the course of pregnancy and there is evidence to suggest that these changes are different in uncomplicated pregnancies compared to hypertensive pregnancies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in maternal body fluid composition during the course of an uncomplicated pregnancy and to assess differences in uncomplicated pregnancies versus hypertensive pregnancies by using a bio-impedance analysis technique. Study design Body fluid composition of each patient was assessed using a multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analyser. Measurements were performed in 276 uncomplicated pregnancies, 34 patients with gestational hypertension, 35 with late onset preeclampsia and 11 with early onset preeclampsia. Statistical analysis was performed at nominal level α=0.05. A longitudinal linear mixed model based analysis was performed for longitudinal evolutions, and ANOVA with a post-hoc Bonferroni was used to identify differences between groups. Results Measurements showed that total body water (TBW), intracellular (ICW) and extracellular water (ECW) and ECW/ICW significantly increase during the course of pregnancy. Late onset preeclampsia is associated with a higher TBW and ECW as compared to uncomplicated pregnancies, the ECW/ICW ratio is higher in preeclamptic patients compared to uncomplicated pregnancies and gestational hypertension, and ICW is not different between groups. Conclusion Body fluid composition changes differ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.502

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 44

Authors
Staelens, A. S., Vonck, S., Molenberghs, G., Malbrain, M. L. N. G., & Gyselaers, W.
Affiliations
  • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (BE)
  • Hasselt University (BE)
  • Ziekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg (BE)
Corresponding author
Staelens, Anneleen S.
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
204
Pages
69-73
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W2485036189
Cited by
44
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, normal pregnancy, total body water, intracellular water, extracellular water, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Body Fluids, Female, Humans, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review