Cited by 39Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsHistorical Medical Research and Treatments

Syphilis in pregnancy: The impact of “the Great Imitator”

Uku, Alison, Albujasim, Zahraa, Dwivedi, Tina, Ladipo, Zana, Konje, Justin C.·2021·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Syphilis remains a common congenital infection over the globe. There has been a tremendous rise in the number of congenital syphilis cases worldwide in the last 20 years. It affects large numbers of pregnant mothers in high burden regions causing a significantly high perinatal mortality and morbidity, which can be easily prevented by early antenatal screening and treatment. Diagnosis of maternal syphilis in pregnancy mainly based on clinical symptoms, serological tests and direct identification of treponemes in clinical samples. However, the diagnosis can be challenging due to the relapsing-remitting nature of the disease. The early stage of the infection is usually symptomatic which is commonly followed by an asymptomatic latent phase but infectious and as a result serological tests will be positive. The risk of transplacental transmission is high during the second and third trimester. Obstetric complications of syphilis include spontaneous miscarriage, non-immune hydrops, stillbirth, preterm labour, low birth weight, increased neonatal mortality and congenital syphilis among neonates. Penicillin is the drug of choice for treatment and should be commenced immediately. Babies born to mothers with syphilis should also be treated with penicillin. Early detection and prompt intervention are the key to the prevention and successful control of congenital syphilis. The aim of this review is to highlight the impact of syphilis infection on pregnancy and discuss the current trends in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uku, A., Albujasim, Z., Dwivedi, T., Ladipo, Z., & Konje, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Tameside Hospital (GB)
  • Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar (QA)
Corresponding author
Uku, Alison
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
259
Pages
207-210
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W3127538073
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
Keywords
maternal syphilis, congenital syphilis, transplacental transmission, perinatal mortality, prenatal screening, serological diagnosis, penicillin therapy, pregnancy complications, stillbirth, low birth weight, nonimmune hydrops, miscarriage
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Syphilis, Syphilis, Congenital, Stillbirth, Perinatal Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review