Excessive gestational weight gain is an independent risk factor for gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies: Results from a French cohort study
Open accessAbstract
Objective Increase in prevalence of maternal obesity worldwide raises concern among health professionals. Our purpose was to evaluate the impact of maternal obesity and of excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) on the course of singleton pregnancies in a French maternity ward. Study design 3599 consecutive women who delivered from April 2013 to May 2015 at Brest University Hospital were included in HPP-IPF cohort study, a study designed to evaluate clinical and biological determinants of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Maternal obesity was defined by a pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m 2 and excessive GWG was defined according to the Institute of Medicine 2009 guidelines. Obstetric complications(including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, venous thromboembolism, PPH, cesarean section (C-section) and macrosomia) were collected prospectively in a standardized case report form. For each complication, Odd Ratios (OR) according to pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG were calculated in univariable and multivariable analyses. Results Out of the 3162 women analyzed for this report, 583 (18.4%) were overweight, 400 (12.7%) were obese and 36.6% had excessive GWG. In multivariable analysis, after adjustment for confounding factors, obese women were at increased risk of GDM (OR 5.83, 95%CI 4.37-7.79), PPH (OR 1.69, 95%CI 1.19-2.41), C-section (OR 2.50, 95%CI 1.92-3.26) and macrosomia (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.31-2.76). Similarly, women with excessive GWG were at increased risk of GDM (OR 1.55, 95%CI 1.17-2.06), C-section (OR 1.46, 95%CI 1.16-1.83) and macrosomia (OR 2.09, 95%CI 1.50-2.91). Conclusions Maternal obesity and excessive GWG are independent risk factors for GDM, C-section and macrosomia in singleton pregnancies. Further studies are needed to evaluate if a lifestyle intervention aiming at avoiding excessive GWG could improve clinical outcomes in pregnant women.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study from Brest, obesity was related to gestational diabetes mellitus (OR 5.83, 95% CI: 4.37-7.79).
“A study from Brest confirmed that obesity is related to GDM (OR 5.83, 95%CI: 4.37–7.79) [116].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [116]
Cites
The effect of gestational weight gain by body mass index on maternal and neonatal outcomes
Crane, J. M. G., White, J., Murphy, P., Burrage, L., & Hutchens, D. (2009) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34050-6 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Schummers, L., Hutcheon, J. A., Bodnar, L. M., Lieberman, E., & Himes, K. P. (2015) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000591 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Lewandowska, M., Więckowska, B., & Sajdak, S. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9061980 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lautredou, M., Pan-Petesch, B., Dupré, P.-F., Drugmanne, G., Nowak, E., Anouilh, F., Briend, D., Salomon, C., Gourhant, L., Le Moigne, E., Merviel, P., Lacut, K., Robin, S., Trémouilhac, C., & de Moreuil, C.
- Affiliations
- Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (FR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 275
- Pages
- 31-36
- ISSN
- 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
- 0301-2115
- OpenAlex
- W4281647803
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 317 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- gestational weight gain, maternal obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus, singleton pregnancy, cesarean section, macrosomia, postpartum hemorrhage, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, venous thromboembolism, pre-pregnancy body mass index, risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Gestational Weight Gain, Pregnancy in Obesity, Obesity, Maternal, Cesarean Section, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review