Validation and application of the Chinese version of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) among parents of children with cancer diagnosis
Abstract
Purpose Parents of children diagnosed with cancer often experience considerable emotional distress for their children with negative emotions, such as disbelief, depression, anxiety, hope and shock. Resilience is defined as the psychological characteristics that promote positive adaptation in the face of stress and adversity, which has been demonstrated to relate to positive coping and less psychological distress. Thus, a quick screening tool to evaluate the levels of resilience of parents with cancer-diagnosed children is urgently required.Methods The Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to evaluate the CD-RISC-10 using a sample size of 500 parents. Velicer's Minimum Average Partial (MAP) Test and a parallel analysis were also supplemented to confirm the EFA-derived structure of the scale. The participants were given the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) and Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire (MCMQ) to test the associates with CD-RISC-10 and obtain the cut-off of the scale.Results The Chinese version of CD-RISC-10 has good psychometric properties and retains its single dimension in the original English version, which can explain 49.602% of the total variance. The CFA demonstrates the fit indices of a one-order model: Chi-Square = 39.987, CMIN/DF = 1.333, P < 0.001, TLI = 0.914, CFI = 0.981, GFI = 0.962, NFI = 0.926, IFI = 0.979, RFI = 0.889, RMR = 0.042, and RMSEA = 0.041. The CD-RISC presents statistical associations with other scales, and the cut-off is 25.5.Conclusions The Chinese version of the CD-RISC-10, which is reliable, valid and easy to use, is suitable for clinical settings. The CD-RISC-10 enables a quick understanding of the level of resilience of the parents when their children undergo treatment, which can be the most important indicator to their psychological health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Chinese adapted Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) had good reliability and validity.
“The original version was adapted by Chinese scholars, with good reliability and validity that were reported (32, 33).”
From Prevalence and Psychosocial Correlates of Mental Health Outcomes Among Chinese College Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 225
- Authors
- Ye, Z. J., Qiu, H. Z., Li, P. F., Chen, P., Liang, M. Z., Liu, M. L., Yu, Y. L., Wang, S. N., & Quan, X. M.
- Affiliations
- Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ye, Zeng Jie
- Quan, Xiao Ming
- ORCID
- Qiu, Hong Zhong
- Venue
- European Journal of Oncology Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 36-44
- ISSN
- 1462-3889 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2588505920
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, CD-RISC-10, parental resilience, childhood cancer, psychometric validation, Chinese version, psychological distress, coping, perceived social support
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, China, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Parents, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, Caregivers, Asian People, Resilience, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review