Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention
Open accessAbstract
Purpose This study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning (SM-SCP) intervention in colorectal and lung cancer survivors.Methods This is a single-group, pre- and post-mixed methods study of an advance practice nurse-driven survivorship care intervention that integrates a survivorship care plan with self-management skills coaching. Colorectal and lung cancer survivors with stage I-III disease were enrolled at 3-6 months after completing treatments, and the intervention was administered in one in-person or telephone session. Survivor outcome measures included depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, QOL, and satisfaction. Paired t-tests were used for exploratory evaluations of pre-to post-intervention score changes. Content analysis was conducted to analyze the qualitative data to describe survivors' experience with the intervention.Results Thirty participants (15 colorectal, 15 lung) enrolled and completed the study (73% retention). It took an average of 40 min to complete the TS/CP and 34.2 min to deliver the intervention. Exploratory analysis revealed significant differences from baseline to post-intervention in depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, physical functioning, role limitations-physical, pain, general health, health transition, physical health summary, and total QOL. Three qualitative themes emerged: 1) Feeling empowered about having a plan; 2) Struggling with psychosocial concerns; and 3) Suggestions for intervention content and delivery.Conclusions The SM-SCP intervention was feasible and acceptable for colorectal and lung cancer survivors after treatment completion. Survivorship care interventions have potential to fulfill the unmet needs of colorectal and lung cancer survivors. Their effectiveness might be greater by integrating conceptually-based models of care, such as self-management skills building.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intervention acceptability was high overall for both patients and caregivers, with mean satisfaction scores of 3.2/4.0 and 3.5/4.0, respectively.
“Intervention acceptability (as measured by self-reported satisfaction mean scores[29–31]) were high overall for both patients and caregivers (3.2/4.0 and 3.5/4.0, respectively).”
From Pilot study of a telehealth perioperative physical activity intervention for older adults with cancer and their caregivers (2020) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Reb, A., Ruel, N., Fakih, M., Lai, L., Salgia, R., Ferrell, B., Sampath, S., Kim, J. Y., Raz, D. J., & Sun, V.
- Affiliations
- City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sun, Virginia
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Oncology Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 29
- Pages
- 125-134
- ISSN
- 1462-3889 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5539921
- OpenAlex
- W2720987282
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA033572)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Keywords
- cancer survivors, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, survivorship care planning, advanced practice nurses, feasibility and acceptability, depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, quality of life, psychosocial problems, telephone-delivered intervention
- MeSH terms
- Cancer Survivors, Self-Management, Survivorship, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Power, Psychological, Quality of Life, Self Care, Colorectal Neoplasms, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review