The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company
Open accessAbstract
Due to an increased awareness and significant environmental pressures from various stakeholders, companies have begun to realize the significance of incorporating green practices into their daily activities. This paper proposes a framework using Fuzzy TOPSIS to select green suppliers for a Brazilian electronics company; our framework is built on the criteria of green supply chain management (GSCM) practices. An empirical analysis is made, and the data are collected from a set of 12 available suppliers. We use a fuzzy TOPSIS approach to rank the suppliers, and the results of the proposed framework are compared with the ranks obtained by both the geometric mean and the graded mean methods of fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Then a Spearman rank correlation coefficient is used to find the statistical difference between the ranks obtained by the three methods. Finally, a sensitivity analysis has been performed to examine the influence of the preferences given by the decision makers for the chosen GSCM practices on the selection of green suppliers. Results indicate that the four dominant criteria are Commitment of senior management to GSCM; Product designs that reduce, reuse, recycle, or reclaim materials, components, or energy; Compliance with legal environmental requirements and auditing programs; and Product designs that avoid or reduce toxic or hazardous material use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Green purchasing practices of US firms
Min, H., & Galle, W. P. (2001) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/eum0000000005923 · Cited by 745
Yang, C.-S., Lu, C.-S., Haider, J. J., & Marlow, P. B. (2013) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2013.03.005 · Cited by 345
Cited by
Green Human Resource Management and Green Supply Chain Management: linking two emerging agendas
Jabbour, C. J. C., & de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.052 · Cited by 889
Self-citationA literature review on green supply chain management: Trends and future challenges
Tseng, M.-L., Islam, M. S., Karia, N., Fauzi, F. A., & Afrin, S. (2019) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.009 · Cited by 820
Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach
Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013 · Cited by 544
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Cuevas-Romo, A., Chowdhury, S., Díaz-Acevedo, N., Albores, P., Despoudi, S., Malesios, C., & Dey, P. (2022) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495 · Cited by 459
Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2016) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340 · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Kannan, D., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., & Jabbour, C. J. C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 233
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 432-447
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094870730
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 53.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.023
- The paper
- Kannan, D., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.