The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Robust optimization approaches for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 76
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Alexander, 2008, Surplus retail food redistribution: An analysis of a third sector model, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, 1290, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.07.009 · DOI
- Altay, 2012, Capability-based resource allocation for effective disaster response, IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 24, 253, 10.1093/imaman/dps001 · DOI
- Balcik, 2008, Last mile distribution in humanitarian relief, Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12, 51, 10.1080/15472450802023329 · DOI
- Balcik, 2014, Multi-vehicle sequential resource allocation for a nonprofit distribution system, IIE Transactions, 46, 1279, 10.1080/0740817X.2013.876240 · DOI
- Beamon, 2008, Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21, 4, 10.1108/09513550810846087 · DOI
- Beck, 2009, Duality in robust optimization: Primal worst equals dual best, Operations Research Letters, 37, 1, 10.1016/j.orl.2008.09.010 · DOI
- Bertsimas, 2004, The price of robustness, Operations Research, 52, 35, 10.1287/opre.1030.0065 · DOI
- Bertsimas, 2011, Theory and applications of robust optimization, SIAM Review, 53, 464, 10.1137/080734510 · DOI · Paper page
- Campbell, 2013, Improving the nutritional quality of emergency food: A study of food bank organizational culture, capacity, and practices, Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 8, 261, 10.1080/19320248.2013.816991 · DOI
- Davis, 2014, Scheduling food bank collections and deliveries to ensure food safety and improve access, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 48, 175, 10.1016/j.seps.2014.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Huang, 2011, Models for relief routing: Equity, efficiency and efficacy, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 17, 416, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.525 · DOI
- Lien, 2014, Sequential resource allocation for nonprofit operations, Operations Research, 62, 301, 10.1287/opre.2013.1244 · DOI
- Marsh, 1994, Equity measurement in facility location analysis: A review and framework, European Journal of Operational Research, 74, 1, 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90200-3 · DOI
- Mohan, 2013, Improving the efficiency of a non-profit supply chain for the food insecure, International Journal of Production Economics, 143, 248, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.019 · DOI
- Ozbay, 2007, Stochastic humanitarian inventory control model for disaster planning, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022, 63, 10.3141/2022-08 · DOI
- Psaraftis, 1985, A tactical decision algorithm for the optimal dispatching of oil spill cleanup equipment, Management Science, 31, 1475, 10.1287/mnsc.31.12.1475 · DOI
- Savas, 1978, On equity in providing public services, Management Science, 24, 800, 10.1287/mnsc.24.8.800 · DOI
- Sengul Orgut, 2015, Modeling for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food under capacity constraints, IIE Transactions, 48, 252, 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1063792 · DOI
- Sengul Orgut, 2017, Modeling for the equitable and effective distribution of food donations under stochastic receiving capacities, IISE Transactions, 49, 567, 10.1080/24725854.2017.1300358 · DOI
- Solak, 2014, The stop-and-drop problem in nonprofit food distribution networks, Annals of Operations Research, 221, 407, 10.1007/s10479-012-1068-7 · DOI
- Taskin, 2010, Inventory decisions for emergency supplies based on hurricane count predictions, International Journal of Production Economics, 126, 66, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.008 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Sengul Orgut, I., Ivy, J. S., Uzsoy, R., & Hale, C.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 516-531
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793137147
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Operational Research (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (CMMI- 1000018)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Facility Location and Emergency Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimization and Mathematical Programming
- Keywords
- food banks, robust optimization, equitable distribution, exact algorithms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust optimization approaches for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.017
- The paper
- Sengul Orgut, I., Ivy, J. S., Uzsoy, R., & Hale, C. (2018). Robust optimization approaches for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.017
