The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A unified framework for stochastic optimization
Abstract
Abstract Stochastic optimization is an umbrella term that includes over a dozen fragmented communities, using a patchwork of sometimes overlapping notational systems with algorithmic strategies that are suited to specific classes of problems. This paper reviews the canonical models of these communities, and proposes a universal modeling framework that encompasses all of these competing approaches. At the heart is an objective function that optimizes over policies that is standard in some approaches, but foreign to others. We then identify four meta-classes of policies that encompasses all of the approaches that we have identified in the research literature or industry practice. In the process, we observe that any adaptive learning algorithm, whether it is derivative-based or derivative-free, is a form of policy that can be tuned to optimize either the cumulative reward (similar to multi-armed bandit problems) or final reward (as is used in ranking and selection or stochastic search). We argue that the principles of bandit problems, long a niche community, should become a core dimension of mainstream stochastic optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Bellman, R. E. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400835386 · Cited by 14,588
A Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643
Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., & Moore, A. W. (1996) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.301 · Cited by 8,972
Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions
Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M., & Welch, W. J. (1998) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008306431147 · Cited by 8,070
Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method
Rubinstein, R. Y., & Kroese, D. P. (2016) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118631980 · Cited by 3,356
THOMPSON, W. R. (1933) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/25.3-4.285 · Cited by 2,712
Regret Analysis of Stochastic and Nonstochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problems
Bubeck, S., & Cesa-Bianchi, N. (2012) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000024 · Cited by 1,295
Cited by
Computational sustainability: computing for a better world and a sustainable future
Gomes, C., Dietterich, T., Barrett, C., Conrad, J., Dilkina, B., Ermon, S., Fang, F., Farnsworth, A., Fern, A., Fern, X., et al. (2019) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3339399 · Cited by 126
Self-citationGoerigk, M., & Khosravi, M. (2023) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2023.03.019 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Powell, W. B.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 795-821
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2884675571
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 17.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A unified framework for stochastic optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.014
- The paper
- Powell, W. B. (2019). A unified framework for stochastic optimization. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.