Cited by 119Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Effect of long‐term neck muscle training on pressure pain threshold: A randomized controlled trial

Ylinen, Jari, Takala, Esa‐Pekka, Kautiainen, Hannu, Nykänen, Matti, Häkkinen, Arja, Pohjolainen, Timo, Karppi, Sirkka‐Liisa, Airaksinen, Olavi·2005·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Muscle tenderness has been measured in several studies to evaluate effectiveness of treatment methods, but only short-term results have been reported so far. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term effects of two different muscle training methods on the pressure pain threshold of neck muscles in women with neck pain. Altogether 180 woman with chronic, non-specific neck pain were randomized into three groups: neck muscle endurance training, neck muscle strength training and control groups. The main outcome measures included pressure pain threshold measurement at six muscle sites and on the sternum. Neck pain was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS). At the 12-month follow-up statistically significantly higher pressure pain threshold values were obtained in both training groups at all muscle sites compared to the baseline, while no significant change occurred in the controls. Significantly higher changes in pressure pain threshold were detected at all six sites in the strength training group and at four out of six sites in the endurance training group compared to the control group. This is the first study to show an increase in pressure pain thresholds as a result of long-term muscle training. A decrease in neck pain was associated with reduced pressure pain sensitivity in neck muscles, showing that the pressure pain threshold may be a useful outcome measure of the effectiveness of neck muscle rehabilitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.01.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 119

Authors
Ylinen, J., Takala, E., Kautiainen, H., Nykänen, M., Häkkinen, A., Pohjolainen, T., Karppi, S., & Airaksinen, O.
Affiliations
  • Central Finland Health Care District (FI)
  • Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
  • Reumasäätiön sairaala (FI)
  • Social Insurance Institution (FI)
  • Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Ylinen, Jari
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
673-673
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2003887926
Cited by
119
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
pressure pain threshold, muscle tenderness, chronic non-specific neck pain, neck pain, muscle endurance training, resistance training, women, long-term training effects, pain sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neck Muscles, Pain Measurement, Physical Fitness, Predictive Value of Tests, Pressure, Sensory Thresholds, Treatment Outcome, Pain Threshold, Neck Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review