Effect of long‐term neck muscle training on pressure pain threshold: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Muscle tenderness has been measured in several studies to evaluate effectiveness of treatment methods, but only short-term results have been reported so far. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term effects of two different muscle training methods on the pressure pain threshold of neck muscles in women with neck pain. Altogether 180 woman with chronic, non-specific neck pain were randomized into three groups: neck muscle endurance training, neck muscle strength training and control groups. The main outcome measures included pressure pain threshold measurement at six muscle sites and on the sternum. Neck pain was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS). At the 12-month follow-up statistically significantly higher pressure pain threshold values were obtained in both training groups at all muscle sites compared to the baseline, while no significant change occurred in the controls. Significantly higher changes in pressure pain threshold were detected at all six sites in the strength training group and at four out of six sites in the endurance training group compared to the control group. This is the first study to show an increase in pressure pain thresholds as a result of long-term muscle training. A decrease in neck pain was associated with reduced pressure pain sensitivity in neck muscles, showing that the pressure pain threshold may be a useful outcome measure of the effectiveness of neck muscle rehabilitation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Measurements of PPT have been shown to have good or excellent interrater and intrarater reliability.
“Measurements of PPT have been shown to have good or excellent interrater and intrarater reliability.36 -38”
From Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Therapeutic Exercise for Temporomandibular Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [37]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 119
- Authors
- Ylinen, J., Takala, E., Kautiainen, H., Nykänen, M., Häkkinen, A., Pohjolainen, T., Karppi, S., & Airaksinen, O.
- Affiliations
- Central Finland Health Care District (FI)
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
- Reumasäätiön sairaala (FI)
- Social Insurance Institution (FI)
- Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Ylinen, Jari
- Venue
- European Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 673-673
- ISSN
- 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2149
- OpenAlex
- W2003887926
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- pressure pain threshold, muscle tenderness, chronic non-specific neck pain, neck pain, muscle endurance training, resistance training, women, long-term training effects, pain sensitivity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neck Muscles, Pain Measurement, Physical Fitness, Predictive Value of Tests, Pressure, Sensory Thresholds, Treatment Outcome, Pain Threshold, Neck Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review