Cited by 119Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMigraine and Headache Studies

Prevalence and co‐occurrence of self‐rated pain and perceived health in school‐children: Age and gender differences

Sundblad, Gunilla M. Brun, Saartok, Tönu, Engström, Lars‐Magnus T., In collaboration with University College of Physical Education and Sports, Stockholm, Sweden·2007·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

In this nationwide study, 1975 students from grades 3, 6, and 9 (ages 9, 12, and 15 at the onset of the year), were recruited from randomly selected schools, which represented different geographical areas throughout Sweden. The main aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of self-reported pain (headache, abdominal, and musculoskeletal pain) and perceived health (problems sleeping and/or if they often felt tired, lonely and sad). A second aim was to study the co-occurrence among different pain and health variables. The students, (n = 1908 distributed by grade 3: 255 girls and 305 boys, grade 6: 347 girls and 352 boys, grade 9: 329 girls and 320 boys) answered retrospectively (three months) a specially designed questionnaire. Fifty percent (50%) of the students reported that they had experienced pain, either as headache, abdominal pain or musculoskeletal pain, within the recall period. Gender differences were especially noticeable for headaches, where twice as many girls (17%, n = 159) than boys (8%, n = 80) reported that they suffered such pain at least once a week or more often. Co-occurrence among the variables was moderate (0.3-0.5). For the total of the seven variables, the perception of pain and health complaints decreased with age for boys from grades 3 to 9, while multiple complaints increased for girls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.02.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 119

Authors
Sundblad, G. M. B., Saartok, T., Engström, L. T., & In collaboration with University College of Physical Education and Sports, S.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
171-180
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2027979583
Cited by
119
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Stockholms Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
Keywords
self-rated pain, health perception, elementary school students, headache, abdominal pain, musculoskeletal pain, gender differences, age differences, prevalence, sleep disorders, fatigue, loneliness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attitude to Health, Child, Depression, Fatigue, Female, Headache, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Sex Characteristics, Sleep Wake Disorders, Sweden, Abdominal Pain, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review