The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A flexible-dose dispenser for immediate and extended release 3D printed tablets
Open accessAbstract
The advances in personalised medicine increased the demand for a fast, accurate and reliable production method of tablets that can be digitally controlled by healthcare staff. A flexible dose tablet system is presented in this study that proved to be suitable for immediate and extended release tablets with a realistic drug loading and an easy-to-swallow tablet design. The method bridges the affordable and digitally controlled Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) 3D printing with a standard pharmaceutical manufacturing process, Hot Melt Extrusion (HME). The reported method was compatible with three methacrylic polymers (Eudragit RL, RS and E) as well as a cellulose-based one (hydroxypropyl cellulose, HPC SSL). The use of a HME based pharmaceutical filament preserved the linear relationship between the mass and printed volume and was utilized to digitally control the dose via an input from computer software with dose accuracy in the range of 91-95%. Higher resolution printing quality doubled the printing time, but showed a little effect on in vitro release pattern of theophylline and weight accuracy. Physical characterization studies indicated that the majority of the model drug (theophylline) in the 3D printed tablet exists in a crystal form. Owing to the small size, ease of use and the highly adjustable nature of FDM 3D printers, the method holds promise for future individualised treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Path to Personalized Medicine
Hamburg, M. A., & Collins, F. S. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1006304 · Cited by 1,970
Cited by
Selective laser sintering (SLS) 3D printing of medicines
Fina, F., Goyanes, A., Gaisford, S., & Basit, A. W. (2017) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.06.082 · Cited by 577
Emergence of 3D Printed Dosage Forms: Opportunities and Challenges
Alhnan, M. A., Okwuosa, T. C., Sadia, M., Wan, K.-W., Ahmed, W., & Arafat, B. (2016) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-016-1933-1 · Cited by 554
Self-citation3D Printing Pharmaceuticals: Drug Development to Frontline Care
Trenfield, S. J., Awad, A., Goyanes, A., Gaisford, S., & Basit, A. W. (2018) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2018.02.006 · Cited by 502
3D Printing technologies for drug delivery: a review
Prasad, L. K., & Smyth, H. (2016) · Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy · doi:10.3109/03639045.2015.1120743 · Cited by 454
Melocchi, A., Parietti, F., Maroni, A., Foppoli, A., Gazzaniga, A., & Zema, L. (2016) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.036 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Pietrzak, K., Isreb, A., & Alhnan, M. A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 96
- Pages
- 380-387
- ISSN
- 0939-6411 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1837872321
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A flexible-dose dispenser for immediate and extended release 3D printed tablets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.07.027
- The paper
- Pietrzak, K., Isreb, A., & Alhnan, M. A. (2015). A flexible-dose dispenser for immediate and extended release 3D printed tablets. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.07.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.