Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality by design in pharmaceutical manufacturing: A systematic review of current status, challenges and future perspectives

Grangeia, Helena Bigares, Silva, Cláudia, Simões, Sérgio Paulo, Reis, Marco S.·2020·European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics

Abstract

Quality by Design (QbD) was originated in the broad domain of Quality Management and was recently adapted and formalized in specific terms for assisting pharmaceutical companies efforts towards market and operational excellence. However, despite some impressive success stories, the pharmaceutical industry have not yet fully embraced QbD, particularly in routine commercial manufacturing [1,2]. In this review, we aim to analyse the current state of implementation of QbD methodologies and tools in the pharmaceutical industry, extracting patterns and trends and identifying gaps and opportunities that may be considered to improve QbD adoption. For this purpose, a critical analysis of 60 research papers was performed, whose contents were classified, compared and summarized at different abstraction levels. Our analysis reveals the following tools as the frequently adopted for conducting each activity: Risk Assessment (RA) - Ishikawa Diagram, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Risk Estimation Matrix (REM); Screening Design of Experiments (DoE) - 2-level Full and Fractional Factorial Designs; Optimisation DoE - Central Composite Design (CCD). Emerging trends include the growing interest in quantifying and managing the impact of raw materials' attributes variability on process and product, as well as the development of Retrospective QbD approaches (rQbD) in complement to standard QbD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.12.007

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Grangeia, H. B., Silva, C., Simões, S. P., & Reis, M. S.
Venue
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
147
Pages
19-37
ISSN
0939-6411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995891886
Cited by
257
References
44
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality by design in pharmaceutical manufacturing: A systematic review of current status, challenges and future perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.12.007
The paper
Grangeia, H. B., Silva, C., Simões, S. P., & Reis, M. S. (2020). Quality by design in pharmaceutical manufacturing: A systematic review of current status, challenges and future perspectives. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.12.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.