Cited by 27Virus-based gene therapy researchViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsProtein purification and stability

Optimization of the quality by design approach for gene therapy products: A case study for adeno-associated viral vectors

Tanaka, Toshimitsu, Hanaoka, Hideki, Sakurai, Shingo·2020·European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics

Abstract

The development of gene therapy products has been expanding globally, and among them, the recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vector is one of the most promising vectors for gene transfer. For efficient and rapid development of the manufacturing process and quality control strategy, the quality by design (QbD) approach can be as effective for gene therapy products as it is for gene recombinant proteins, which have been developed for decades. However, prior available knowledge required for the QbD approach is limited in the field of gene therapy. Here, we comprehensively review rAAV study results that can form the basis of QbD-based development and propose a critical quality attribute identification method suitable for gene therapy development. As a case study for rAAV, we propose a series of practical development steps, including a quality target product profile (QTPP) setting, identification of critical quality attributes (CQAs), repetitive risk assessment associated with process optimization, design space (DS) establishment, and control strategy using the QbD method. Our case study, which was based on publicly available literature, is a basic model that can be augmented by unique data pertaining to specific products. An improvement in rAAV development is expected using this model as the first step.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.08.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 27

Authors
Tanaka, T., Hanaoka, H., & Sakurai, S.
Affiliations
Chiba University (JP)
Corresponding author
Tanaka, Toshimitsu
Venue
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
155
Pages
88-102
ISSN
0939-6411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048151498
Cited by
27
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
quality by design, gene therapy products, recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors, critical quality attributes, quality target product profile, design space, control strategy, risk assessment, process optimization, manufacturing process development, quality control strategies
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Genetic Therapy, Risk Assessment, Qualitative Research, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review