Morphine state-dependent learning: Sensitization and interactions with dopamine receptors
Abstract
In the present study, the effects of morphine sensitization on impairment of memory formation and the state-dependent learning by morphine have been investigated in mice. Pretraining administration of morphine (0.5, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg) dose dependently decreased the learning of a one-trial passive avoidance task. Pretest administration of morphine (0.5, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg) induced state-dependent retrieval of the memory acquired under pretraining morphine influence. Pretraining or pretest administration of naloxone (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg) reversed both responses to morphine (5 mg/kg). Amnesia induced by pretraining morphine was significantly reversed in morphine-sensitized mice which had previously received once daily injections of morphine [20 and 30 mg/kg, subcutaneously (s.c.)] for 3 days. Morphine sensitization tended to reverse but did not significantly affect morphine state-dependent memory. The inhibition of morphine-induced amnesia in morphine-sensitized mice was decreased by once daily administration of naloxone (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg) 30 min prior to injection of morphine (20 mg/kg/day x 3 days). Three-days administration of 1-phenyl-7,8-dihydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine HCL (SKF 38393; 8, 16 and 32 mg/kg) or SCH 23390; R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine HCL (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) before morphine (for 3 days) and during morphine-sensitization, decreased and increased, the amnesia induced by pretraining morphine, respectively. Similar administration of quinpirole (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg) or sulpiride (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg) before morphine also decreased and increased the amnesia induced by pretraining morphine, respectively. The results suggest that morphine sensitization affects the impairment of memory formation, but not the facilitation of retrieval induced by morphine and thus it is postulated that dopamine receptors may play an important role in this effect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Treatment with opioid agonists disrupts avoidance learning.
“Specifically, treatment with opioid agonists have been reported to interfere with acquisition (Spain and Newsom, 1991;Zhu et al., 2011) and retrieval (Zhu et al., 2011) of spatial memories, and to disrupt working memory (Itoh et al., 1994), avoidance learning (Aguilar et al., 1998;Ukai et al., 1997;Zarrindast and Rezayof, 2004), and spatial recognition memory (Ma et al., 2007).”
From A review of the relation between dissociation, memory, executive functioning and social cognition in military members and civilians with neuropsychiatric conditions (2016) · cites this paper as Zarrindast and Rezayof, 2004
Cites
McBride, W. J., Murphy, J. M., & Ikemoto, S. (1999) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00022-4 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McKinnon, M. C., Boyd, J. E., Frewen, P. A., Lanius, U. F., Jetly, R., Richardson, J. D., & Lanius, R. A. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.017 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“…(Spain and Newsom, 1991; Zhu et al., 2011) and retrieval (Zhu et al., 2011) of spatial memories, and to disrupt working memory (Itoh et al., 1994), avoidance learning (Aguilar et al., 1998; Ukai et al., 1997; Zarrindast and Rezayof, 2004), and spatial recognition memory (Ma et al., 2007).”
- Authors
- Zarrindast, M.-R., & Rezayof, A.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IR)
- University of Tehran (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Zarrindast, Mohammad-Reza
- Venue
- European Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 497
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-204
- ISSN
- 0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000543816
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- morphine, state-dependent learning, memory retrieval, memory impairment, morphine sensitization, naloxone, dopamine receptors, SKF 38393, SCH 23390, quinpirole, sulpiride, passive avoidance, amnesia, opioid tolerance, mice, dopamine D1/D5 receptors, dopamine D2 receptor, dopamine D3 receptor, dopamine D4 receptor
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Avoidance Learning, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Morphine, Receptors, Dopamine, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review