Cited by 32Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsIon Channels and Receptors

AM404, an inhibitor of anandamide reuptake decreases Fos-immunoreactivity in the spinal cord of neuropathic rats after non-noxious stimulation

Rodella, Luigi F., Borsani, Elisa, Rezzani, Rita, Ricci, Francesca, Buffoli, Barbara, Bianchi, Rossella·2005·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Cannabinoids like anandamide are involved in pain transmission. In this study we evaluated the effects of administrating N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetraenamide (AM404), an inhibitor of anandamide reuptake and monitoring the expression of c-fos, a marker of activated neurons in an experimental model of neuropathic pain (sciatic nerve tying). Fos expression was monitored 14 days after tying of sciatic nerve and 2 h after non-noxious stimulation. We showed that non-noxious stimulation increased Fos-positivity in the dorsal superficial laminae of the lumbar spinal cord of tied animals but not in the control animals. AM404 significantly reduced Fos induction in tied animals. Co-administration of cannabinoid CB1 receptor, cannabinoid CB2 receptor and transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV-1) antagonists reduced the effect of AM404 and this reduction was higher using cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist. These results suggest that AM404 could be a useful drug to reduce neuropathic pain and that cannabinoid CB1 receptor, cannabinoid CB2 receptor and vanilloid TRPV-1 receptor are involved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.12.031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chronic administration of AM404 significantly decreases CCI-induced Fos expression in the lumbar spinal cord through CB1/CB2 and TRPV1-mediated mechanisms.

    “Chronic administration of AM404 significantly decreased CCI-induced Fos expression in the lumbar spinal cord through CB1/CB2 and TRPV1-mediated mechanisms.58”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 32

Authors
Rodella, L. F., Borsani, E., Rezzani, R., Ricci, F., Buffoli, B., & Bianchi, R.
Affiliations
University of Brescia (IT)
Corresponding author
Rodella, Luigi F.
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
508
Issue
1-3
Pages
139-146
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029215871
Cited by
32
References
66
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
AM404, neuropathic pain, sciatic nerve constriction, Fos expression, spinal cord, CB1 receptor, CB2 receptor, TRPV1, cannabinoid analgesia, dorsal horn
MeSH terms
Animals, Arachidonic Acids, Capsaicin, Constriction, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Immunohistochemistry, Indoles, Male, Physical Stimulation, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Sciatic Nerve, Spinal Cord, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Polyunsaturated Alkamides, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review