Mild anxiogenic effects of nicotine withdrawal in mice
Abstract
Increased anxiety is one of the symptoms of nicotine withdrawal that may lead to relapse. Previous studies have shown that nicotine withdrawal affects anxiety-like behavior in different tests of anxiety in humans and rats. However, relatively few studies have focused on the anxiogenic effect of nicotine withdrawal in mice. The present study investigated the effect of nicotine withdrawal on anxiety-like behavior in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mouse strains in the light-dark box, acoustic startle response, and prepulse inhibition tests. An initial experiment showed that nicotine administration of 12 or 24 mg/kg/day (free base) for 14 days did not result in significant effects during withdrawal in startle, prepulse inhibition, or light-dark box, but there was a trend towards an anxiogenic effect in the light-dark box 24 h, but not 1 or 4 h, after cessation of nicotine administration. A subsequent study was therefore performed, with minipumps delivering saline, 24 mg/kg/day nicotine, or 48 mg/kg/day nicotine (free base), for 14 days. The pumps were removed, and the mice were tested 24 h after cessation of nicotine administration. Cessation of administration of 48 mg/kg/day nicotine free base in C57BL/6J mice resulted in increased anxiety-like behavior in the light-dark box, while the behavior of DBA/2J mice was unaffected. The acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition were also unaffected in both strains. In conclusion, the present data show that nicotine withdrawal is mildly anxiogenic in C57BL/6J mice under the conditions used in the present experiments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nicotine withdrawal can elicit anxiety-like behaviors in mice.
“Nicotine withdrawal can elicit anxiety-like behaviors in mice [190–192].”
From Mechanistic insights into nicotine withdrawal (2011) · cites this paper as [192]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Jonkman, S., Henry, B., Semenova, S., & Markou, A.
- Affiliations
- Scripps Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Markou, Athina
- ORCID
- Jonkman, Sietse
- Venue
- European Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 516
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-45
- ISSN
- 0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970886109
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 11946, R56DA011946)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- nicotine withdrawal, anxiogenic effects, anxiety-like behavior, DBA/2J mice, C57BL/6J mice, strain differences, acoustic startle response, prepulse inhibition, light-dark box, nicotine self-administration, smoking relapse
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Darkness, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Ganglionic Stimulants, Inhibition, Psychological, Light, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred DBA, Nicotine, Reflex, Startle, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review