Synergy between Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and morphine in the arthritic rat
Abstract
We have shown in past isobolographic studies that a small amount of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) can enhance morphine antinociception in mice. However, previous studies of the Delta(9)-THC/morphine interaction were performed using normal mice or rats and evaluated acute thermal antinociception. Less is known about cannabinoid and opioid interactions involved in mechanical nociception and in chronic inflammatory pain models, such as Freund's complete adjuvant-induced arthritic model. One fixed-ratio combination was chosen for testing the interaction between Delta(9)-THC and morphine in the Freund's adjuvant-induced arthritic model. This combination represented a 1:1 ratio of the drugs and thus consisted of equieffective doses ranging from 0.1 to 5 mg/kg Delta(9)-THC and from 0.1 to 5 mg/kg morphine. The combination ED(50) value for the fixed ratios (total dose) in relation to the ED(50) value of the drugs alone was determined. The isobolographic analysis indicated a synergistic interaction between Delta(9)-THC and morphine in both the non-arthritic and the arthritic rats. Since Freund's adjuvant-induced alteration in endogenous opioid tone has been previously shown, our data indicate that such changes did not preclude the use of Delta(9)-THC and morphine in combination. As with acute preclinical pain models in which the Delta(9)-THC/morphine combination results in less tolerance development, the implication of the study for chronic pain conditions is discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Co-administration of THC and morphine produces synergistic antinociceptive effects in the rat CFA arthritis model.
“Co-administration of THC and morphine produces synergistic antinociceptive effects in the rat CFA arthritis model (Cox et al, 2007).”
From The endogenous cannabinoid system: a budding source of targets for treating inflammatory and neuropathic pain (2018) · cites this paper as Cox et al, 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 78
- Authors
- Cox, M. L., Haller, V. L., & Welch, S. P.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haller, Victoria L.
- Venue
- European Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 567
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 125-130
- ISSN
- 0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068417523
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 07027, 5P01DA-09789, P01DA009789, DA 05274, T32DA007027)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, morphine, drug interactions, synergistic effect, isobolographic analysis, complete Freund's adjuvant-induced arthritis, chronic inflammatory pain, mechanical nociception, analgesia, opioid tolerance
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arthritis, Experimental, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Synergism, Drug Therapy, Combination, Male, Morphine, Narcotics, Physical Stimulation, Pressure, Dronabinol, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Pain Threshold, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review