Cited by 78Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Opioid Use

Synergy between Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and morphine in the arthritic rat

Cox, Melinda L., Haller, Victoria L., Welch, Sandra P.·2007·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

We have shown in past isobolographic studies that a small amount of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) can enhance morphine antinociception in mice. However, previous studies of the Delta(9)-THC/morphine interaction were performed using normal mice or rats and evaluated acute thermal antinociception. Less is known about cannabinoid and opioid interactions involved in mechanical nociception and in chronic inflammatory pain models, such as Freund's complete adjuvant-induced arthritic model. One fixed-ratio combination was chosen for testing the interaction between Delta(9)-THC and morphine in the Freund's adjuvant-induced arthritic model. This combination represented a 1:1 ratio of the drugs and thus consisted of equieffective doses ranging from 0.1 to 5 mg/kg Delta(9)-THC and from 0.1 to 5 mg/kg morphine. The combination ED(50) value for the fixed ratios (total dose) in relation to the ED(50) value of the drugs alone was determined. The isobolographic analysis indicated a synergistic interaction between Delta(9)-THC and morphine in both the non-arthritic and the arthritic rats. Since Freund's adjuvant-induced alteration in endogenous opioid tone has been previously shown, our data indicate that such changes did not preclude the use of Delta(9)-THC and morphine in combination. As with acute preclinical pain models in which the Delta(9)-THC/morphine combination results in less tolerance development, the implication of the study for chronic pain conditions is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.04.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 78

Authors
Cox, M. L., Haller, V. L., & Welch, S. P.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Haller, Victoria L.
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
567
Issue
1-2
Pages
125-130
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068417523
Cited by
78
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 07027, 5P01DA-09789, P01DA009789, DA 05274, T32DA007027)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, morphine, drug interactions, synergistic effect, isobolographic analysis, complete Freund's adjuvant-induced arthritis, chronic inflammatory pain, mechanical nociception, analgesia, opioid tolerance
MeSH terms
Animals, Arthritis, Experimental, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Synergism, Drug Therapy, Combination, Male, Morphine, Narcotics, Physical Stimulation, Pressure, Dronabinol, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Pain Threshold, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review