Cited by 44Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Neuroprotection in focal cerebral ischemia owing to delayed treatment with melanocortins

Open access
Giuliani, Daniela, Ottani, Alessandra, Mioni, Chiara, Bazzani, Carla, Galantucci, Maria, Minutoli, Letteria, Bitto, Alessandra, Zaffe, Davide +3 more·2007·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

In gerbils subjected to transient global cerebral ischemia, melanocortin peptides produce long-lasting protection with a broad time window, and through the activation of central nervous system melanocortin MC(4) receptors. Here we aimed to investigate whether melanocortins are neuroprotective also in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia induced by intrastriatal microinjection of endothelin-1. The vasoconstrictor agent endothelin-1 caused a significant impairment in spatial learning and memory, as well as in sensory-motor orientation and limb use, associated with severe striatal morphological damage including intense neuronal death and an almost complete myelin degradation. Treatment of ischemic rats with a nanomolar dose (340 microg/kg/day i.p. for 11 days, beginning 3 h or 9 h after endothelin-1 microinjection) of the melanocortin analog [Nle(4), D-Phe(7)]alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (NDP-alpha-MSH) significantly reduced striatal damage, and improved subsequent functional recovery, with all scheduled NDP-alpha-MSH treatments. Pharmacological blockade of melanocortin MC(4) receptors prevented the protective effect of NDP-alpha-MSH. Our findings give evidence that melanocortins are neuroprotective, with a broad time window, also in a severe model of focal cerebral ischemia, and suggest that melanocortin MC(4) receptor agonists could produce neuroprotection in different experimental models of ischemic stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.05.025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 44

Authors
Giuliani, D., Ottani, A., Mioni, C., Bazzani, C., Galantucci, M., Minutoli, L., Bitto, A., Zaffe, D., Botticelli, A. R., Squadrito, F., & Guarini, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • University of Messina (IT)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
Corresponding author
Guarini, Salvatore
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
570
Issue
1-3
Pages
57-65
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064772762
Cited by
44
References
74
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
neuroprotection, focal cerebral ischemia, melanocortin peptides, endothelin-1, striatal damage, treatment delay, ischemic stroke, spatial learning and memory, myelin degradation, functional recovery
MeSH terms
alpha-MSH, Animals, Brain, Brain Ischemia, Male, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Rats, Wistar, Neuroprotective Agents, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review