Cited by 3Sphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingLysosomal Storage Disorders Research

The in vitro metabolism of sphingosine-1-phosphate: identification; inhibition and pharmacological implications

Bradley, Michelle E., McGuinness, Neil, Williams, Gareth, Charlton, Steven J., Dowling, Mark R.·2011·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

A time-dependent decrease in S1P potency was observed in a [(35)S]-GTPγS binding assay using CHO-cell membranes expressing the human S1P(2) receptor. After a three hour incubation with membranes the pEC(50) of S1P was 7.09 ± 0.03, compared to 8.59 ± 0.10 for that obtained without pre-incubation. To determine if S1P was subjected to metabolic breakdown we developed a bioassay to measure S1P activity which confirmed the findings from the [(35)S]-GTPγS binding experiments. LC-MS/MS techniques were also used to measure the concentrations of S1P and its breakdown product sphingosine. In the presence of CHO-cell membranes the t(1/2) of S1P breakdown to sphingosine was 42.99 ± 0.40 min, this is in contrast to that obtained without the inclusion of membranes (256.30 ± 113.84 min), confirming the metabolism of S1P in vitro. Finally, the effects of different phosphatase inhibitors were investigated to determine whether it was possible to prevent the metabolism of S1P. In the presence of sodium orthovanadate, the pEC(50) for S1P obtained in the [(35)S]-GTPγS binding assay, after three hour pre-incubation with membranes was 8.91 ± 0.03. In contrast that obtained without Na(3)VO(4) was 7.19 ± 0.04. These data suggest that phosphatases are active in cell membrane preparations and are responsible for S1P metabolism in vitro. In the absence of sodium orthovanadate, it is envisaged that experiments involving exogenously applied S1P to broken cell preparations, whole cells or tissues, coupled…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.09.178

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bradley, M. E., McGuinness, N., Williams, G., Charlton, S. J., & Dowling, M. R.
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
672
Issue
1-3
Pages
56-61
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088333361
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Keywords
sphingosine-1-phosphate, S1P metabolism, sphingosine, S1P2 receptor, phosphatase, sodium orthovanadate, phosphatase inhibition, GTPgammaS binding
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Membrane, Cricetulus, Enzyme Inhibitors, Cricetinae, Humans, Kinetics, Lysophospholipids, Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases, Sphingosine, Vanadates, CHO Cells, Receptors, Lysosphingolipid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review