The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development of a nanoprecipitation method intended for the entrapment of hydrophilic drugs into nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates formulation and process modifications to improve the versatility of the nanoprecipitation technique, particularly with respect to the encapsulation of hydrophilic drugs (e.g. proteins). More specifically, the principal objective was to explore the influence of such modifications on nanoparticle size. Selected parameters of the nanoprecipitation method, such as the solvent and the non-solvent nature, the solvent/non-solvent volume ratio and the polymer concentration, were varied so as to obtain polymeric nano-carriers. The feasibility of such a modified method was assessed and resulting unloaded nanoparticles were characterized with respect to their size and shape. It was shown that the mean particle size was closely dependent on the type of non-solvent selected. When alcohols were used, the final mean size increased in the sequence: methanol<ethanol<propanol. Surfactants added to the dispersing medium were usually unnecessary for final suspension stabilization. Changing the solvent/non-solvent volume ratio was also not a determinant factor for nanoparticle formation and their final characteristics, provided that the final mixture itself did not become a solvent for the polymer. A too high polymer concentration in the solvent, however, prevented nanoparticle formation. Both poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) could be used by accurately choosing the polymer solvent and in this respect, some non-toxic solvents with different dielectric constants were selected. The nanoparticles obtained ranged from about 85-560 nm in size. The nanoparticle recovery step however needs further improvements, since bridges between particles which cause flocculation could be observed. Finally, the presented results demonstrate that the nanoprecipitation technique is more versatile and flexible than previously thought and that a wide range of parameters can be modified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanoparticles as potential oral delivery systems of proteins and vaccines: A mechanistic approach
des Rieux, A., Fievez, V., Garinot, M., Schneider, Y.-J., & Préat, V. (2006) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.08.013 · Cited by 1,305
Formulation of functionalized PLGA-PEG Nanoparticles for in vivo targeted drug delivery
Cheng, J., Teply, B. A., Sherifi, I., Sung, J., Luther, G., Gu, F. X., Levy-Nissenbaum, E., Radovic-Moreno, A. F., Langer, R., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.047 · Cited by 1,273
Nanoprecipitation process: From encapsulation to drug delivery
Martínez Rivas, C. J., Tarhini, M., Badri, W., Miladi, K., Greige-Gerges, H., Nazari, Q. A., Galindo Rodríguez, S. A., Román, R. Á., Fessi, H., & Elaissari, A. (2017) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.064 · Cited by 733
Thorat, A. A., & Dalvi, S. V. (2012) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.044 · Cited by 438
Cho, A.-N., Jin, Y., An, Y., Kim, J., Choi, Y. S., Lee, J. S., Kim, J., Choi, W.-Y., Koo, D.-J., Yu, W., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24775-5 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Bilati, U., Allémann, E., & Doelker, E.
- Venue
- European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-75
- ISSN
- 0928-0987 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038375609
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a nanoprecipitation method intended for the entrapment of hydrophilic drugs into nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejps.2004.09.011
- The paper
- Bilati, U., Allémann, E., & Doelker, E. (2005). Development of a nanoprecipitation method intended for the entrapment of hydrophilic drugs into nanoparticles. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2004.09.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.