Cited by 46Barrier Structure and Function StudiesDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Tuning the predictive capacity of the PAMPA-BBB model

Müller, Judit, Esső, Katalin, Dargó, Gergő, Könczöl, Árpád, Balogh, György T.·2015·European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

Due to its robustness and versatility, several variations of the blood-brain barrier specific parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA-BBB) have been reported in the central nervous system (CNS) drug discovery practice. In this study, the impact of the main assay parameters on the predictive power of PAMPA-BBB was thoroughly investigated with 27, passively BBB-transported drug molecules with in vivo logBB data. The single and combined effects of the following variables were systematically studied and optimized: incubation time and temperature (4 vs. 18h, RT vs. 37°C), type of the read-out (UV-reader vs. HPLC), solvent composition (n-dodecane/n-hexane), lipid concentration (0-10w/v % PBLE), cholesterol content (0-1.66w/v %), and thickness of the lipid membrane, and the DMSO cosolvent content (5-20v/v %), respectively. Based on our results, solvent-driven and lipid-driven mechanisms of diffusion were identified in different assay conditions. Moreover, the analysis of membrane retention (MR%; the mole fraction of solute "lost" to the membrane) data obtained at various membrane compositions (volume of solvent and concentration of phospholipids) revealed the compound-specific nature of this parameter. The optimized conditions for the PAMPA-BBB were the following: 4h incubation at 37°C, detection by HPLC-DAD, iso-pH conditions (pH=7.4) with 5v/v % DMSO content in buffer solutions, and PBLE (10w/v %; without cholesterol) as membrane dissolved in the mixture of n-hexane:n-dodecane 3:1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.08.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Müller, J., Esső, K., Dargó, G., Könczöl, Á., & Balogh, G. T.
Affiliations
  • Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
  • Corvinus University of Budapest (HU)
  • Gedeon Richter (Hungary) (HU)
Corresponding author
Balogh, György T.
Venue
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
79
Pages
53-60
ISSN
0928-0987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1602503879
Cited by
46
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Gedeon Richter
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
blood-brain barrier permeability, CNS drug discovery, membrane retention, cholesterol content
MeSH terms
Blood-Brain Barrier, Humans, Membranes, Artificial, Models, Biological, Permeability, Pharmacokinetics, Caco-2 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review