Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy compared to CBT+: Preliminary results
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Preliminary results of a study by our research group with 67 patients indicate significant improvements in depression for inpatients in both ACT and CBT conditions but no between group differences.
“Preliminary results of a study conducted by our research group with 67 patients indicate significant improvements in depression for inpatients in both the ACT and CBT conditions but no between group differences (Pleger et al., 2018).”
From A clinical effectiveness trial comparing ACT and CBT for inpatients with depressive and mixed mental disorders (2021) · cites this paper as Pleger et al., 2018
In a pilot study where the same group allocation procedure was applied, no between group differences due to the allocation process could be detected.
“Fourth, in a pilot study where the same group allocation procedure was applied, no between group differences due to the allocation process could be detected (Pleger et al., 2018).”
From A clinical effectiveness trial comparing ACT and CBT for inpatients with depressive and mixed mental disorders (2021) · cites this paper as Pleger et al., 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Pleger, M., Treppner, K., Diefenbacher, A., Schade, C., Dambacher, C., & Fydrich, T.
- Affiliations
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pleger, M.
- ORCID
- Fydrich, T.
- Venue
- The European Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 166-173
- ISSN
- 0213-6163 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2821176014
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The European Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- acceptance and commitment therapy, CBT, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, group therapy, treatment effectiveness, hospitalized patients, psychiatric inpatient treatment, symptom severity, mindfulness, valued living
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
